All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The statement saying that companies hire outside consultants to get suggestions for company's own benifit rather than listening to their own employees will be benificial. I agree that it is true that a company should hire someone from the outside to get suggestion for efficiently operating it because they can provide unbiased and practical suggestions.
One may argue that employees of the company know better about the organisation so they can provide better suggestions. Employees can discuss ideas among themselves to get more ideas for efficient operation. However, it is also possible that there might be bipolar views among the employees and the ideas may conflict. Then one will have to interfere and come up with the solution, which may not be aggreable by some of the employees, which leads to employee unsatisfaction. For this reason too, it is a sound choice to hire someone from the outside to get the viewpoint.
One reason for my agreement is that hiring people from outside benefits company because their standpoints are unbiased. when a person giving their views is attached to the company they can be biased by their other friend. Also, there are chances that someone on the higher position can petronize a person to give suggestion on their benefit. If person is from the outside of the company, he can give indefferent suggestion, without being influenced by anyone from the company.
Another reason for my agreement lies in the fact that someone from inside the company may have restricted knowledge, only based on their own companies. Their ideas can be good for the company but for the outer world, where the company needs to compete with its rival, it is important that the suggestions help company to stand in the overall market. When a person is hired from the outside, it is believed that they have wide knowledge of how other companies are operating, and thus they can provide better suggestions which can help company not only to operate well but can also improve company's positions among their competetors.
In sum, the consent that company hire outside consultant for company's efficient operate is unambiguously agreeable because of the reasons that listening to employees from the company can lead to biased views and consulant can provide unbiased, indifferent views and based on their wide knowlwdge and experience.
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 53
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 54
- the following appeared as a letter to the editor of a national newspaper Your recent article on corporate downsizing in Elthyria maintains that the majority of competent workers who have lost jobs as a result of downsizing face serious economic hardship o 55
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 66
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...solution, which may not be aggreable by some of the employees, which leads to employee unsa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...because their standpoints are unbiased. when a person giving their views is attached...
^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...because their standpoints are unbiased. when a person giving their views is attached...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, as for, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11917098446 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70753525077 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445595854922 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.465266091 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.733333333 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7333333333 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391217863842 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155251915733 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107076912564 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268210048534 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945106141525 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.