The greatness of individuals can be detected only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Some people say that someone's true value is always determined when they are not with us. However, that is not true; greatness can not be determined only by those who live after them. one's contemporaries can know better about the facts and hence they can truely judge the person unlike the people who judge the person just by the stories, biographies and other resources.
one may argue that judging a person while they are alive can be difficult. Greatness can be judged only when a whole story has been seen because a person may change their views and values of life. Also person's position, their success change throughout their lifespan. For example, Abraham Linkon, once the president of United states, has seen many faliures in his life, during that time his contemparies may not value his his greatness untill he became the president. So it is important that people see person's life as a the whole picture and then decide their greateness and that can only done by the people who live after them. Though, it seems considerable there are flaws in these arguments.
People living after an individual has only resorces to judge them. These resources only has major events of a persons life and there can be biased. Most of the biographies and auto-biographies include only positive aspects of a person's life. Hearing facts from people can also be biased and change with individuals. One can not truely judge a person based on just these resources which represent reality that can not be validated.
Even though person's values and greatness can change during his lifespan, it can not be said that thier greatness can only be judged by the people who live after them and not with them.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ones
...ined only by those who live after them. ones contemporaries can know better about th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ined only by those who live after them. ones contemporaries can know better about th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...s, biographies and other resources. one may argue that judging a person while t...
^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... change their views and values of life. Also persons position, their success change ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: his
...hat time his contemparies may not value his his greatness untill he became the presiden...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...portant that people see persons life as a the whole picture and then decide their gre...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...done by the people who live after them. Though, it seems considerable there are flaws ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...se resources only has major events of a persons life and there can be biased. Most of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...hies include only positive aspects of a persons life. Hearing facts from people can als...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sent reality that can not be validated. Even though persons values and greatness...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who live after them and not with them.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 290.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84482758621 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45356640615 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486206896552 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.354000187 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427249628379 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169950963314 0.0831039109588 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160406985392 0.0758088955206 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314878954124 0.150359130593 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703690922326 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ones
...ined only by those who live after them. ones contemporaries can know better about th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ined only by those who live after them. ones contemporaries can know better about th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...s, biographies and other resources. one may argue that judging a person while t...
^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... change their views and values of life. Also persons position, their success change ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: his
...hat time his contemparies may not value his his greatness untill he became the presiden...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...portant that people see persons life as a the whole picture and then decide their gre...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...done by the people who live after them. Though, it seems considerable there are flaws ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...se resources only has major events of a persons life and there can be biased. Most of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...hies include only positive aspects of a persons life. Hearing facts from people can als...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sent reality that can not be validated. Even though persons values and greatness...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who live after them and not with them.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 290.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84482758621 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45356640615 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486206896552 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.354000187 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427249628379 0.243740707755 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169950963314 0.0831039109588 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160406985392 0.0758088955206 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314878954124 0.150359130593 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703690922326 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.