It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Social cliques play an intrinsic role in defining one's personality. However, it is one of the factors affecting it. It does not mean that it subjugates other factors in defining one's personality and thus I disagree with the statement.
Some consensus with the statement can be considered, that is the social cliques serve as a source to share and converse the ideas. The hegemony of certain ideas influences one's personality. For example, People congregating often get influenced by the edify shared by the leader of the clique. In the field of politics, a group or party often try to influence people's thought and thoughts define their personality. Hence, it can be argued that social groups do influence our personality.
However, saying that it is the primary source for one's identification or personality is contradictory. People who are introverts do not like to be associated with any social groups or their social groups are limited to 3-4 people. It can be manifested that their personality is not defined by any group and that does not mean they do not have any individual personality.
Moreover, some people like to be associated with more than one social group, even the groups that share different ideas but, they are free to choose their views and personalities even they can decide to be neutral and not follow any social group's ideas. Hence, even though a person is associated with the groups, it depends on the individual which ideas they want to follow or get influenced by. A ramification leads to the fact that it is an individual's volition to get influenced by particular thoughts that define their personality and not the clique.
Another reason for my disagreement is that social groups are not the only factor that defines an individual's persona. There are other factors like their interest, their field of studies, their idols, heredity, a family background that contributes to their personality.
To conclude, social groups, do influence a person's thoughts and personality but saying it is a primary reason is unreliable. Other factors equally contribute to defining the person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ques play an intrinsic role in defining ones personality. However, it is one of the ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...it subjugates other factors in defining ones personality and thus I disagree with th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...he hegemony of certain ideas influences ones personality. For example, People congre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...le congregating often get influenced by the edify shared by the leader of the clique. In ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...aying that it is the primary source for ones identification or personality is contra...
^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...or personality is contradictory. People who are introverts do not like to be associated...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ication leads to the fact that it is an individuals volition to get influenced by particula...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...are not the only factor that defines an individuals persona. There are other factors like t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13005780347 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90080270845 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.42774566474 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.961141015 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6111111111 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21692316728 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807818516179 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639747718705 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125810252565 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428164152862 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.