All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might no hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Running a company is not a easy task especially a company that is held to such a high standard. In fact, it is completely normal for comapnies to adhead to advice of thrid party consultants however, taking feeback from employees as well as consultants is needed to run an efficient company. The prompt recommedns that if companies paid more attention to the critiques of their own employees, then consultants would not be needed. I mostly disagree with that suggest and argue that incorportating feedback from both the employees and the consultants would be advised in order to operate for efficiently for three reasons
To begin, if companies listened to the pleas of their employees, it would give the employees a sense of respect that will improve their motivation to work harder. If employees feel like their bosses actually care about what they have to say, they will feel like their opionins do matter and have a more positive outlook towards working for the companies. Employees are also able to harness more information about the mangement as well as the work ethic that the company performs at and could be a influenctial factor in deciding whether the the company needs improvement and in what areas. An example of this is The Great Southwest Railroad Strike. Employees felt like their voices were being reached to the ears of ther employeers as well as they were forced to work in harsh working enviornments that made them less likely to perform adequate work. This later resultsd in the disbanding of the union. Thus, if employees hold the knowledge about the workers opinions and if voiced to the employeers, they will be able to imrpove their management and allow the employees to work in stable and an happy work enviornemnt, hence improve company efficency.
However, in most cases, it can be more benefical to hire consultants rather than listening to their employees. Consultants are able to give more advice on the buisness side of the company whereas employees have knowledge about how to do the work rather than how to run the buisness. Consultants are able to help the companies budget thri profits which can lead to higher salary pay for the employees and boost productivity. Consultants can also help advocate and advertise the company on telvision or billboard which can boost up sales. For example, a person who has done MBA in finance has more knowledge about what strategy will give more revenue than just an engineer or anyone outside of the feild. Hence, it is better to take suggests from outside consultants rathen than the employees who don't hold any water when it comes to business stategies.
Furthermore, consultants are more likely to give an impartial viewpoint on the companies efficiencies comapared to employees. Outside consultants get paid to increase the productivity of the company and not do so in the facor of the campny that they have just gotten to know. If employees were asked to give their opionion about how the business is being run, they will perhaps give a biased opion in fear of being fired or reprimanded for giving a negative review. Employees might purpossly give a bad review and not think in the best interest of the company if the employee holds a bad history with the employeer. The best way for companies to ask for advice is from consultants in order to gain an clear and unbaised advice.
In conclusion, the scheme of listening to their eomployees rather than consultants needs to be debated on. While both sides have their pros, there are numerous cons that comes with it. We are more likley to reach an adequate solution from takign advice from different aspects of the company: the mangement and the finance. The main motto should be to improve the growth of the company and everyone invovled should strive for it.
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 75
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 66
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 66
- Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One graduate of the course was able to read a 500 page report in only two hours another graduate rose from an a 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
Running a company is not a easy task especially a company that is ...
^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...at the company performs at and could be a influenctial factor in deciding whether...
^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...influenctial factor in deciding whether the the company needs improvement and in what a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...influenctial factor in deciding whether the the company needs improvement and in what a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1094, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...low the employees to work in stable and an happy work enviornemnt, hence improve c...
^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r the employees and boost productivity. Consultants can also help advocate and advertise th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 797, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nsultants rathen than the employees who dont hold any water when it comes to busines...
^^^^
Line 7, column 699, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ce is from consultants in order to gain an clear and unbaised advice. In conclu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, then, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 94.0 58.6224719101 160% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3154.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 644.0 442.535393258 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89751552795 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0375743251 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66317159209 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448757763975 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 967.5 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3341278017 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.16 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.76 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41432243729 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127711847813 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731378312665 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257137093423 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777691946368 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.