All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Every company at a certain stage requires consultation for efficiently operating. In the issue mentioned companies hire outside consultants as they feel consultants are the go to solution for efficient operation of the company. However, I believe for the fact that the company overall runs by the work of the employees. Before hiring an outside consultant it is very important to know the thoughts and status of the employees working and address to the feedback returned from the employees.
I strongly agree to the fact that listening to employees is utmost important which could reduce the need of hiring consultants.For example, if a company feels it has not been performing well in the past 2 quarters or so, the first step should be to analyze the working structure of the employees. The second step could be figuring out the strength and weakness of the employees. Another effective thing could be conducting a general meeting or a review session where employees can state their grieviences or suggest some strong strategy. Spending more time and having healthy conversation with the employees help in both ways where the employees gets an oppportunity to express themselves and the employer can make further decisions based on the result.
But, in certain cases hiring an consultant could be need of the hour. It could be due to the urgency or making strategic plans in short period of time. Consultants, surely do have an experience in making smart and well plan moves which can make
vision clearer for the employer and help in the growth of the company. But a consultant can never make as perfect plan as an employee feedback could as the consultant never knows the working of the company to the core or the issue that every employeer contributing faces.
To conclude, I firmly feel that the first and the best step is to converse more with the employees as they are the pillar and core of the company. It is essential to listen to the employees, work on the suggestions and hire a consultant if there is no way out.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...d reduce the need of hiring consultants.For example, if a company feels it has not ...
^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...could be conducting a general meeting or a review session where employees can sta...
^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...result. But, in certain cases hiring an consultant could be need of the hour. I...
^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ency or making strategic plans in short period of time. Consultants, surely do have an experie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...smart and well plan moves which can make vision clearer for the employer and help...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, well, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87031700288 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76191070088 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49855907781 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0649758277 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342121450752 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125889536517 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784449472903 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187654288807 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854340785519 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.