All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement made prefers internal debates and discussions over outside consultations. This choice is not a trivial one as it may decide the future of the company. This is a very important thing to ponder upon as one single mistake may lead to bankruptcy of the company whereas one good decision may turn the company into a multi-millionare corporation. I disagree with the statement made and give a higher prefernece to outside counsaltants over inner ones for these reasons. To begin, a company must a have very broad scope of thinking and mindset. It must never confine itseld in just one kind of thoughts. It must listen to both- praises as well as criticism to get the real idea of what is right and what is wrong in the work culture of the company. Outstide consultants provide a broader view of the whole market scene which is hard to achieve if a company just relies on its inside consultants. There may be a case where inside consultants have just become perfunctory and praises each and every step that the manager takes to please him for a mere increase in their own salaries. Some managers just want to listen praises and no criticism. So, when an oustsider consultant gets involved, he doesn't have any such liability to please the manager. The makes the company see the actual standing of itself in the competitive market. Criticism is as important as praise. It makes one work harder for perfection which is really important in this competitive market. This sense of competition and self realization can be perfectly provided by outside consultants who don't need to bowtow to his manager all the time unlike internal consultants.Further, outside consultants provide the company with an oppurtunity to look further and provide a better understanding of market. It provides the frog to look beyond his own well. Sometimes, outsider consultants may provide some critical inside information about the opponents which may lead to a profit of millions. So, spending a few thousand on them is a win win situation for the company. At once, it may look like an additional expenditure which is not required at all to some. But it provides the corporation an exponentially higher chance at making profit and subsequently a big success. Insider consultants can only be useful when an oragnization wants to be good at internal affairs. External ones brings broader mindset and more liberal point of view with them. This will be evident in the profit of the company if they hire really good and proper exteranl consultants. Of course, some may argue that the company must listen to internal consultants as well. This is true as well but it never closes the path to have external consultants as well. Perhaps, the oragnization must aim at making a perefect balance of internal and external consultants. But, listening to own employees as the prompt says can never justify eficient operation and expenditure on external consultants. External consultants can never be unnecessary until and unless the oraganization wants to die out in a matter of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 644, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...oughts. It must listen to both- praises as well as criticism to get the real idea of what ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1201, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... oustsider consultant gets involved, he doesnt have any such liability to please the m...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1569, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tly provided by outside consultants who dont need to bowtow to his manager all the t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1645, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Further
...ll the time unlike internal consultants.Further, outside consultants provide the compan...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2004, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
...o, spending a few thousand on them is a win win situation for the company. At once, it ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, really, so, well, whereas, kind of, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2538.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94245622403 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479532163743 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.269550097 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6428571429 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3214285714 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262808847635 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063979320769 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474836751603 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262808847635 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.