All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
"Company's reputation comes from where it stand in the current market and how they deals with their compitators. In this, the author claims that companies should make necessary operational changes by referring to their employees feedback rather than hiring an outside consultant for that task. I disagree with the author's view due to certain below-mentioned reasons.
First, outsider will have neutral views. For example, if company would ask their employees to provide a feedback for further improvements needed in the company's infrastructure then they can provide a biased opinion in fear. They will have fear that if they write anything wrong then they may get fired. This case is eventually not be possible if company will hire an outside consultant.
Furthermore, outsider will have complete view of current market and also know where the particular company stands in the market. So, they will have global percepective of a company's reputation and can suggest some changes that can benifit a company. For example, Microsoft hire consultant from outside to know where they currently stand in the market and what are the changes that one can see from outside are required within the company. Thus, it take outside views in consideration which sometimes might be not visible from inside.
In addition to this, outside consultants will be expert in this area they know how to guide company towards the path of success. While, the employee working in the company are only expert in their area or division so they can only provide information limiting to their area. For example the software engineer of Google would only know how their division operates and can only provide that guidance not for other divisions. While, consultant will take all the division in the consideration.
Some can argue that employees know their company well than outsider so, their opinion is what matter most to a company. We can agree to this up to certain extant, but their opinion will highly influenced by what is their salaray, who is their manager and several other factors which can diverge them from stating real problems.
Thus, we can conclude that company can move forward along the path of success if they choose to hire outside consultant plus take the view of some of their employee into the accound while doing any operational changes."
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stands'?
Suggestion: stands
...Companys reputation comes from where it stand in the current market and how they deal...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'deal'
Suggestion: deal
...tand in the current market and how they deals with their compitators. In this, the au...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'takes'?
Suggestion: takes
...e required within the company. Thus, it take outside views in consideration which so...
^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... that guidance not for other divisions. While, consultant will take all the division ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ision in the consideration. Some can argue that employees know their company well ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'influence'
Suggestion: influence
...n extant, but their opinion will highly influenced by what is their salaray, who is their ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1328125 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63712349003 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473958333333 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5588826744 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281882074809 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108311012129 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067742583807 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172417413026 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330998652278 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.