The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
The nation is the place where rulers, scientists, a great businessman and the normal people leave their lives. The author claims that the greatness of nation is defined by the general welfare of the people not by the achievements of its rulers, scientists or artists. I completely disagree with this claims due to below-mentioned some of the reasons.
First, it is the people that defines the nation not the rulers, artists or scientists. In a nation there can be few of the great personality that had achieved tremendous in their lives but they are not the one which can represent the whole nation. It is the normal people and how are they feeling by living in this nation is what that defines the greatness of the nation. For example, Vietnam this place has very few popular personality but it is one of the lowest crime nation and people of that place are more happier than others. So, we can conclude that Vietnam is the great nation and it is not defined by famous persons who are originated their it is their people.
Second, how well one had performed or made achievements in their career as no linkage with nation's greatness. They have came up with their hardworking and intellectual power and nation had negligible or no role in their achievements. For example, Christiana Ronaldo a famous football player from Portugal had become great football by his hardwork and talent although Portugal has higher crime rates per capita and it is not the place that people generally preferred to live. Country had no role behinds its achievement and success he had made so far.
Furthermore, the great nations aim to view and fulfill the public demands and to make them feel happier. They take care of their people and this is the important factor while assessing any nation. For example, USA all know that it is the great place to live but what makes them great is not their scientists or rulers, it is the people that are placed in that nation and how well the nation treat their citizens is the major factor that defines the nations greatness.
Although the above points made the claims stronger but some can argue that nation is the place that can gave a person moral boost to achieve their dreams and be a renoun personality. It is also correct up to some extant but it is not always true in all the cases and in most of the cases nation does not play major role in defining person identity. Thus people are the face of the nation and from them we can define how great a particular nation is.
We can conclude that general welfare of the people signals the greatness of the nation. The people who lives in the nation are the face of the nation and how well they are treated defines the superiority of the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...with this claims due to below-mentioned some of the reasons. First, it is the people tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
...ime nation and people of that place are more happier than others. So, we can conclude that V...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...nkage with nations greatness. They have came up with their hardworking and intellect...
^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llectual power and nation had negligible or no role in their achievements. For ex...
^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ns is the major factor that defines the nations greatness. Although the above point...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
...rue in all the cases and in most of the cases nation does not play major role in defi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, second, so, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2247.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63298969072 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.428153502 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.389690721649 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4365690744 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.35 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302868639903 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122073527756 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100097817618 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194076483115 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686443428434 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 48.8420337079 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.