All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
Here the statement puts forward a question that, is hiring an external consultant does the company operates more efficiently? Hiring a consulatnt depends from company to company and it is based on requirement and condition of the organization. Consultant hiring comes with its own pros and cons, but I do believe that hiring one would surely be beneficial for the company as whole. Let me put forth a few key factors to validate my point: Consultants are the people who are master in their respectie domain. They provide outside the box solutions. Companies hire a consultant when they feel that they are stuck somewhere are their employees would not be able to solve the problem. Let us unbderstand with a help of an example. Let's say there is a ship company and thier ship engine is stuck and it is not getting started, all the employee have tried to start the ship but it didn't start. So, a company hires an external person who has mastery in the ship engine and the person with his experience is able to start the ship engine. So, taking help from a person who is not the employee could help the company to come out of the problem. By hiring a consultant company has many advantages. First, the company could save money by hiring the consultant when the issue arises. Secondly, consultant works in various organization so, they know more about the market requirement and they can provide better analyses about a product or a service that is it going to work in the market or not. Thirdly, consultant are master in the field and they can provide solution which a regual employee may not have thought about. These are the few advantages which the companies has by hiring an external consultants. Not denying the fact, that the compnany should not listen to the solutions provided by their employees. But each employee has its own restriction of knowledge and capability of solving a problem. For instance, it could happen that the employee are stuck at a problem for many days and even after brain-stroming lots of ideas and trying different approches the solution is not coming. In that case by takling help from an external person would be beneficial, as he can see a problem in a different way and might be able to provide the solution. In conclusion, the company should do what it feels would be best for it. If hiring a consultant they feel that it would increase the efficiency and optimise the process then they should hire one. But before the company hires one they should do a proper analyses and have an open discussion with the employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'operate'?
Suggestion: operate
...an external consultant does the company operates more efficiently? Hiring a consulatnt d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 728, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... unbderstand with a help of an example. Lets say there is a ship company and thier s...
^^^^
Line 1, column 876, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...yee have tried to start the ship but it didnt start. So, a company hires an external ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1686, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consultant'?
Suggestion: consultant
...the companies has by hiring an external consultants. Not denying the fact, that the compnan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2181, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... be beneficial, as he can see a problem in a different way and might be able to provide the soluti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69642857143 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61038203866 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448660714286 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3674403286 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6363636364 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379017763576 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123983210692 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826377300047 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.379017763576 0.150359130593 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.