Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Modern technologies have become an integral part of learning in schools. The current global sophistication and vagueness need to be understood lucidly otherwise in the course for competing better life one may fall behind. The prompt says that, these innovations have also been a distracting cause for many students and I support the given statement with following reasons.
First of all, the world of internet is huge where details for every trivial to significant issue are just one click away. How simplistic have life become because of this, so have been the teaching and learning process. However, there too lies plethora of negatively impacting ideas which may hinder the thought flow and processing for students. For example, age restricted video and films are confidential and permitted to certain age group only, but there are many cases where school children have made the assess to such adult films despite the restriction imposed out of teachers and parents consent. This is certainly one of the major issues for distraction among student which has been conveniently aided by internet.
Secondly, the internet based assignment and project have nothing been more than a copied project where creation and novel presentation is better not expected. The internet has all lists of everything we want, either it’s a science project or documentary we want to make. So any newness we expect from student either in creativity of logical interpretation, it’s merely a copy of what already existed. Therefore, the system of plagiarism has found its pace as creation did not find its place so did dedication of working on our own without deceit. Even though, videos, computers and internet have aided teachers to lift their burden of tentative teaching, students on the other hand have found their ways to get along with it in simple and less exhausting ways.
Lastly, every innovation has its pros and cons, like the same exist here as well. The videos, computers and internet can be used to its full potential and better learning can be done once we get serious about our needs and wants. Distraction is a mere mind deviation which cannot be an issue once we are lost in the work we are focusing about. To use the technologies in its advantageous way or not it’s one’s choice. Student should rather be encouraged towards innovation and new platform to sharpen their knowledge and this can be possible if availability of not essential content, links and video are restricted. They should be made known about all the benefits one can take from internet through its wise use.
To sum up, though innovation have simplified teaching and learning process, the cons of using them may be the cause of ineffective learning process. Otherwise, the surfeit of information in internet is a platform to learn more and explore more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... so have been the teaching and learning process. However, there too lies plethora of ne...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...y cases where school children have made the assess to such adult films despite the restric...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6872017789 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1068773635 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213183274496 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603696873738 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323760087775 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115378382773 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272166875192 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.