I’m a big fan of online-learning. Whatever the subject is, as long as I’m interested in, I can click my key words on the internet, and myriads of resources and free online courses will jump out. While excited to open the video and start crack the concept of the subject, I soon am soon distracted by several message alert from my Facebook account—Lily and Minty have commented on my post, then I spontaneously abandon my learning page and switch to my page of Facebook. I guess I’m not the only one who much often is distracted by messages or entertainment flooded on the internet through mobile phones, Ipad, social media applications etc. And people start to blame such technology used nowadays can be a stonewall to let us concentrate on studies. As far as I’m concerned, it is not the technology itself to be blamed, instead, we human being are misusing the technologies and sometimes indulge ourselves in a world of fun and comfort that is leading us to the wrong way.
First of all, I do recognize the tremendous advantages and benefit that great innovation and technologies has made today’s learning more flexible and available. By breaking the traditional teaching mode in the classroom, students can now sit in their homes and start self-learning with internet access to a PC. Further, students could join a webinar to discuss certain topics and even go digging into deeper level of the subject based on their interest. Internet as a revolution has provided profound convenience and resources for today’s learning.
However, some may argue that as the technology continues to develop, people begin to feel their life indispensable from mobile phones, and thus greatly impact on the quality of learning and working. Video games, social media applications, shopping websites take a great amount of time people’s life. The usage record of time people spend on mobile phones can reach to 4 hours a day which equals to half of the standard working time. The fact is, a lot of people keep those means of entertaining around them, when they are simultaneously doing study and research. It is extremely difficult for us to get rid of these distractions due to our natural habit. Albeit, we cannot simply refute that the fault must go to the innovation. Since these technologies do help us relieve our pressure and fulfill the monotonousness of our lives. It is when people make inappropriate habit and abuse the technology that incur such negative impacts.
If people could take a good balance between their study and having fun, and we can avoid chances to let technology destroy our study. Successful leaders have known this rule of distraction, they tend to stay away from those things that would prevent them from achieving their target. Hence, when we are studying, trying to put mobile phones away, and close all social media accounts would create a peaceful environment that allows us to focus on our subject.
In summary, i believe that technology has its benefits and disadvantages, it is how people manage and utilize it that makes the result different. To learn the skills of keeping distractions away will profoundly increase our studying and working quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: KEY_WORDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keywords'?
Suggestion: keywords
... I'm interested in, I can click my key words on the internet, and myriads of resourc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 720, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...me such technology used nowadays can be a stonewall to let us concentrate on studies. As fa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'those means'?
Suggestion: this means; those means
...time. The fact is, a lot of people keep those means of entertaining around them, when they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... to focus on our subject. In summary, i believe that technology has its benefit...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus, while, i guess, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2683.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03377110694 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89590508748 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 307.0 215.323595506 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575984990619 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6288619615 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.652173913 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1739130435 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82608695652 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13535025546 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387661194166 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275514763996 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714643928056 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232819968788 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.