Many people believe that it is the hardship and impediment that shape a great political leader, since they have demonstrated their tremendous contribution through the difficult times and brought people new hope for the future. However, it is not always true to claim that the challenges actually attribute to great political leaders, in fact what makes a great leader stand out of the era is his personal leadership skills and his long-term insight. The inner abilities play a larger role in sculpturing an excellent political leader.
First of all, we consider some political leaders as great by evaluating if they are responsible for a major revolution or legislative regulations that significantly enhanced the quality of people lives or the overall country’s social environment. They make such decisions due to their fabulous strategic thinking and magnificent leading skills. This conduct can be executed under challenging situations as well as peaceful environment. We can also find so many underperformed leaders, even they are under hard time. The truth is: a great leader is shaped by his abilities and skills rather than the environment he lives in.
Often times, we realize the fantastic change a great political leader is bringing in hard times, but we are inclined to ignore the immense efforts political leaders devoted in maintaining same proudful economic growth and scientific breakthroughs. People tend to give a higher standard to recognize a great leader in temperate eras. A great leader is able to sustain the current booming economy and adjust existing social conflicts and problems. Anyone without sophisticated skills and abilities are not capable of delivering such successful results. The inner abilities of a leader counts much more than the era he stands in.
In addition, people might say political leaders are challenged to make revolutions and lead improvements only under certain situations. They are forced to make an adjustment in the pressure of unpleasant sometimes unbearable environment. Imagine if we put any incapable person in a same challenging position, we couldn’t expect him to conduct any inspirational or effective policies that could make a positive influence to the society, because he is not aware of how to control the situation or provide and practical solutions.
So, it is rash to conclude that challenges shape a great leader.
To conclude, we cannot simply account the contribution of a great leader to the period he is situated, instead we should realize what his characteristics and abilities that lead him to accomplish the success. Moreover, we should not use same criteria to evaluate leaders under different periods of challenges. That is unfair to actually a well-performed leader under a peaceful era. The inner abilities and leadership skills are what make a great leader in a contemporary world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in fact, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37004405286 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06548427058 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519823788546 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0765373605 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.095238095 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292886496347 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947897226086 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592516594313 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172255643791 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380004684009 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.