In order to reach political goals, some people believe that it is essential for political leaders to take public opinion and sometimes make changes to their decisions; while other people think that as long as the principles and objectives of the leadership remain the same, he could be a very effective leader. As far as I’m concerned, it is totally acceptable that leaders choose to make particular compromises in order to control and administrate the whole situation. More importantly, political leaders should stick to their ultimate objective. The reason why I strengthen the importance of remaining political objective constant is as follows:
To start with, a nation needs a clear strategy for all functions to operate, in other words a country’s economy, agriculture, industry, medical care, education etc. should be inducing to a same target, so that the leaders can reach their political goals in all areas effectively. If a political leader announces to protect the environment, whereas his policies in economy conspicuously violate this claim in order to gain particular benefit. Then his policies are not effective to reach his political goals and hard to convince his people.
Furthermore, being consistently committed to political principles doesn’t mean a leader has to remain the same policies under any conditions or ignore the voice of his people. It is deniable that observing the changes in current society and making adjustment in a nation’s rules and policies are crucial to meet his people’s requirement for a better life. The objective of improving a better environment for his people, should be identical from the beginning to the end, no matter what policies are implemented. China has put up a policy of “one child per family” to control the population 20 years ago. By that time, China was facing huge resource deficiency and poverty caused by large population. 20 years later, China broke up this policy by allowing a second child in a family, to solve the population aging problem and reduce the pressure of middle-age generation. The change of population policy reflects Chinese leader’s focus on improving living environment for all generations holistically.
Finally, an effective leader should always stands on his initial promise to his nation. It is way too common there are opposing voice everywhere, but an excellent leader should not bend to his opponents and make compromises. This will only leave opponents opportunities to create more trouble for this country. However, his is not alone. By keeping the integrity and devotion to his target, he is winning the heart of the major population of the nation. It is true that no policy is available to satisfy all parties, and sometimes violates the benefits of certain rage of people. If the leader chooses to stop or change his way, then probably there is never a chance for him to reach his objective.
In summary, I do support a leader to keep up on his commitment whenever and whatever, however his practices and policies can be flexible during different periods. Only by showing strong determination to make a revolution, can him be an effective and successful political leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 653, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itical objective constant is as follows: To start with, a nation needs a clear st...
^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'stand'
Suggestion: stand
...ally, an effective leader should always stands on his initial promise to his nation. I...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, as to, in particular, in summary, in other words, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2701.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23449612403 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01389614083 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513565891473 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 877.5 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2428921048 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.434782609 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4347826087 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47826086957 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250822245166 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754480915684 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885671538378 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162369289169 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100278291506 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.