Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi

Essay topics:

Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

One of the charracteristic of an effective leader is their ability to take sound judgement in difficult times. Also, a good leader is also recognized by the relation maintained with his or her peers. But, in terms of their precedence to look for a great leader, it is a predicament to ascertain one of them at the top. Let's have a look at some instances.

In most of the democratic countries, it is a common belief that a party in majority in congress is mainly effective due to the respect amongst several politicians in order to make a sound judgement in policy making. But this is based on the pretense that an idea is envisioned by collective group. In fact, a major factor is left out and that is effective decision making. An effective decision can only be initiated by a sound leader for the party sitting in that session, and because of an initiation of this sound decision is the reason why a congress is established alongside the leader in order to make that decision making even more effective.

Recently, we have been hit by a once-in-a-century pandemic. In these troubled times, a sound moral judgement of a leader was required in order to lead the country in the process of healing and thereby taking tough decisions in this predicament. Not only this would help the country in the healing process, but if done right, the leader would be able to earn and maintain the respect of their peers in the long term, as seen for the Prime Minister of New Zealand.

We have seen a lot of billion-dollar unicorns developed in the past two decades, mainly Apple being at it's pinnacle. As we know, Steve Jobs was removed from the company as many did not respect him in that time as they thought his decisions were rash and damaging to the company. But as he came back, even then he took those challenging decision, but now, he was using them in a way that in current time, there was an agreement to those decisions as they matched the time i.e. a sound moral judgement was taken. That has changed the mindset of those in aversion and even they started respecting him.

In the above instances, we were able to see that a sound moral judgement of a leader can lead to peers respecting him. Also, we saw that both of them can also go hand-in-hand in policy making. So, in the end, I would like to say that it is very important for a leader to maintain respect of their peers, as it can lead to some dire consequences, but it is as important as sound moral judgement of a leader as a leader is tested in dire times, and in those times, both sound moral judgement and support of your peers is needed.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...nt to ascertain one of them at the top. Lets have a look at some instances. In mo...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48319327731 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64646185079 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443277310924 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.1567137889 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.555555556 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239905620224 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731450387273 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067640682839 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136121664128 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542145459034 0.0667264976115 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.