Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
In terms of great leaders, it might remind us of those who had made the world change. Some leaders are successful because of their ability and also dedicated to charity work like Bill Gates. On the other hand, Bezos had undoubtedly made a great contribution to the world by producing one of the influential company of 21 century. Still, he is also notorious for extramarital affair scandals. I would say the leader's ability is necessary to maintain the respect of his or her peers, but we could never view a leader's ability and moral judgment separately.
As a Chinese proverb goes, you must first manage yourself, then you can manage family, a country, and the world. It shows how important a person should know how to control himself or herself first to direct others. Moreover, A leader's job is to let team members create the max value instead of getting everything done by oneself. So a leader doesn't have to be the most skilled person in a team but should be the one who knows best about every team members' advantages.
Leaders decide the team's direction, and sound moral judgment is what it takes to win members' trust and go a long way. A blood-testing start-up Therano's founder, Elizabeth Holmes, was once lauded as "the next Steve Jobs." After making an immoral decision to deceive investors and the public about the technology progress, the scandal exploded and finally caused the company to be shut down. Elizabeth might be able to lie to outsiders, but she could never lie to her employees. And that's why Therano was frequently recruiting - because the employees often didn't stand too long. This exemplified how a leader's morality affects followers' loyalty and even the team's faith.
Ability is definitely what makes a leader, but I would surely add weight to sound moral judgment when it comes to maintaining respect from peers. Only when a leader has a strong faith in the right value, he or she can lead the company in the right way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...ng one of the influential company of 21 century. Still, he is also notorious for extram...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...arital affair scandals. I would say the leaders ability is necessary to maintain the re...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...or her peers, but we could never view a leaders ability and moral judgment separately. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...everything done by oneself. So a leader doesnt have to be the most skilled person in a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...bers advantages. Leaders decide the teams direction, and sound moral judgment is ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e could never lie to her employees. And thats why Therano was frequently recruiting -...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ecruiting - because the employees often didnt stand too long. This exemplified how a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... stand too long. This exemplified how a leaders morality affects followers loyalty and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 667, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
... affects followers loyalty and even the teams faith. Ability is definitely what ma...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, still, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 338.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81656804734 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57317106942 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60650887574 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0666448148 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278591442344 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766001363106 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955475173443 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151478514718 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535878055347 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.