Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views may be devaststing. Admittedly, very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs. However, to state that this kind of conversations are not useful would be imprudent because it set the goal on the wrong thing. The goal should never be changing other's mind, having conversation itself is meaningful.
First, it is necessary to gain different perspectives. For instance, democracy is cherished by most of the people in the world nowadays. And the best thing about democracy is that different ideas are compatible in a society. Listening to people who have the contrasting views allow us to see the world in versatile angles.
Second, articulating one's own idea is a good way to help organize one's thinking. When phasing the idea, we are able to consider the topics again, therefore figure out points lack reasoning, or even strengthen our belief.
Finally, this is the best chance to have deep conversations with others. Nowadays, with the pervasiveness of social media, relationships became shallow and full of small talks. The opportunity to share ideas and discuss is rare. In the premiss of understanding of each other, this could be a way to deepen the relationship.
In conclusion, having conversations on controversial topics is useful to vertalize our life. While we can never change how other think, pondering on the same topic and have deep conversations give us good reason to do it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to see the world in versatile angles. Second, articulating ones own idea is a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...own idea is a good way to help organize ones thinking. When phasing the idea, we are...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 241.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21991701245 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04047182709 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618257261411 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4279980739 60.3974514979 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.625 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0625 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299814598816 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894608307534 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112833519492 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143667112874 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150081041823 0.0667264976115 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.