The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead

Essay topics:

The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.

The topic raises the issue of whether the best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. I generally agree that the team members' opinion important for the growth of the leaders and also the whole team.

First of all, immediate feedback is necessary for anyone who would like to improve themselves. In the book Grit, the author has mentioned that deliberate practice is essential to make a mark. Within deliberate practice, it requires immediate feedback to help amend the directions. For good leaders, the people whom they lead are one of the resouces they can seek advice for.

Furthermore, one could argue that people who are led are not able to have the overall picture to provide the suitable feedback. However, leaders make decisions that affect all members and the future. Thus, it is vital to percept things through the holistic view. Team members, although can only see a part of the situation, could provide valuable insights that a leader are hardly able to observe.

Last but not least, when leading a team, it is said that the outcome can differ a lot whether the members work for the leader or for money. And encouraging the feedback from the members could make them feel important and influential to the team. Thus could serve as the incentive to make the team better.

In conclusion, although it may be hard to for leaders to accept different opinions from the people whom they lead, it is essential for the leaders and the whole team.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...y lead. I generally agree that the team members opinion important for the growth of the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the resouces they can seek advice for. Furthermore, one could argue that people...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at a leader are hardly able to observe. Last but not least, when leading a team,...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... important and influential to the team. Thus could serve as the incentive to make th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the incentive to make the team better. In conclusion, although it may be hard t...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 58.6224719101 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 256.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8359375 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40187050725 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6327865854 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.4285714286 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405870854236 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137833845946 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191608502276 0.0758088955206 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250378356562 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149154456485 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.