Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
I agree with the statement that although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader's ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. The following are the reason to account for the same.
It is true that when you are a leader of a team it becomes essential to judge the work performance of your peers for the efficient working of the team. Leader should have the capability to guide or give directions to their peers so that they should not proceed in wrong direction. But this moral judgment should be given maintaining the respect of their peers. It should not cross the dignity of their peers. They should not feel disgusted or insulted in front of others while enumerating their drawbacks or correcting them for the way they performed at their duty. Judging the peers in a way to insult them will only demotivate them and it will not motivate them to muse over their fault. Moral judment should be given by leader in a friendly way so that peers should feel that they are being guided by friend not by leader.
One should not feel complex when enumerating their team performance by leader. As it will bring bad impression to peer's mind. They will always have fear of being judged by their leader and being felt inferior in front of their colleagues or members of their team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ive leader, it is not as important as a leaders ability to maintain the respect of his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 730, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a friendly way" with adverb for "friendly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...Moral judment should be given by leader in a friendly way so that peers should feel that they are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ating their team performance by leader. As it will bring bad impression to peers m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 2235.4752809 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 242.0 442.535393258 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60330578512 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46547085713 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 215.323595506 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47520661157 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 704.065955056 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2536699813 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8333333333 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302341662869 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121406346451 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218546763811 0.0758088955206 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307462137399 0.150359130593 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.292912397208 0.0667264976115 439% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 48.8420337079 157% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 100.480337079 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.