Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
A leader is a person who is chosen by his or her peers to lead them in different situations. A leader must have the respect and belief in the cause or idea for which he or she is fighting for. When someone is chosen as a leader he is bound to follow certain untold rules.
Every leader has some responsibilites as well as duties for his or her peers. But for a leader nothing is as import as to be "Successful Leader". In order to become a successful leader one has to be more skeptical about moral judgement than anything else. A leader is followed by a number of people, but when a leader makes certain judgements that are not well accepted by his or her followers then he has to accept that he is not in the verge of becoming an "Effective Leader". A leader must always keep aside his or her personal emptions when making tough decisions. If he or she doesn't then there no difference between a normal man and a Leader. For example, we all know Gandhi was a gregarious leader and he always cared about his peers as well as for the people of India. However, he has never compromised his leadership for the sake of the inhuman beatdown that he received by the British Government. He stood steady, he stood strong and that's what defines the characteristic of a true leader.
However, a leader is also a human he also has a feeling for his peers. There might be situations where a leader has to take strict actions against his or her own peer(s). But this might hold a leader from his duties. He is a leader of all, he is not the leader of a single person.
Finally, we can say that moral judgement is something that defines a true leader although a leader must have deep respect for his or her peers but upto a certain extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...en making tough decisions. If he or she doesnt then there no difference between a norm...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 965, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...t. He stood steady, he stood strong and thats what defines the characteristic of a tr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, then, well, as for, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39384615385 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68247699715 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467692307692 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9350519404 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341560607888 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129199996862 0.0831039109588 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599704989797 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231857047591 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422298189722 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 12.1639044944 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.