Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers
An effective leader is responsible for taking important decisions which may affect many people. The gravity of these decisions cannot be fully comprehended without the presence of a sound moral compass.
One of the most important characteristic of a leader is his moral compass. It allows a leader to make decisions keeping in mind the ethicality of the impact of those decisions. While not having a sound moral judgment may not appear to be a big flaw, it can lead to the misuse of power or position by the leader. Also, the respect of peers can be earned by making morally sound decisions which can best achieve the desired outcome. Thus, while maintaining the respect of peers is an important characteristic in itself, it can never fulfill the void created by the absence of a strong moral compass.
Secondly, the respect earned from peers could be due to a misplaced sense of reverence to someone who is in a position of power or could be due to a sense of fear for one's life. To take an example: Hitler was well respected by his peers but committed some of the worst atrocities as the supreme leader of Germany. If the peer group with which one is surrounded does not have a sound moral judgment, the leader could be amoral decisions without fearing about the consequences of such decisions.
A sound moral compass also allows a leader to make decisions keeping in mind differing viewpoints of both majority and minority groups and not favor a specific group while making decisions. It is especially a necessary characteristic, for elected officials as they have to make policy decisions, keeping in mind the impact of those decisions for groups with differing characteristics. A sound moral judgment is also required to prevent any unethical use of power against any specific group or to silence groups who are against the view of the leader.
Although a sound moral compass may not be the most important characteristic in a situation such as a war, where a leader might be forced to make decisions which are not morally sound for the greater good, it’s still a desired quality which separates respected leaders from others.
Thus, a sound moral compass is a necessary and important characteristic in a leader and cannot be replaced by the ability of a leader to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...h can best achieve the desired outcome. Thus while maintaining the respect of ones p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
.... Thus while maintaining the respect of ones peers is an important characteristic in...
^^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... Secondly, the respect earned from ones peer could be out of a misplaced sense ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 172, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... or could be due to a sense of fear for ones life. To take an example: Hitler was we...
^^^^
Line 9, column 261, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the worst'.
Suggestion: of the worst
...spected by his peers but committed some of worst atrocities as the supreme leader of Ger...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87909319899 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80269461544 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415617128463 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.9 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6795252816 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.133333333 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4666666667 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419911486128 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168056216856 0.0831039109588 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128292535662 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263190490317 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115188858304 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.