In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your
position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The arguer claims that those in power are supposed to leave after five years in any field, such as business, politics and government. Although it is reasonable in several perspectives, I tend to disagree with this argument.
Firstly, under this policy, it might well happen that there is no suitable person to take the place of the former after five years. For example, in some small agencies which are set up newly, the number of staff is limited. In this case, it might be difficult to change the power every five years. For most most growing firms, the first exigent issue is about how to develop the business, rather than change the leaders in five years.
Secondly, there is a great possibility that the reinvention started from the old leaders would be stemmed and forsaken by the new ones. Since most strategies are long-term goals which usually take more than five years to achieve, it is dramatically critical to keep the policies as a continuous task. Therefore, if the firms implement the policy in changing the power regularly, the strategies could not be applied efficiently. On this occasion, it would suffer from the waste of funding, human resources and even clients.
However, we could not ignore some benefits of implementing this policy. For instance, if the old power promoted outdated strategies before the replacement, then the new leaders would alter the old rules and policies during the revolution, such as opening new markets, rebranding, and producing new products. Moreover, in some fields with rapid development, such as education and government, it is necessary to replace the old leaders with the new ones, so that the government could decline the risk of corruption, and maintain the timeliness of their polices. However, in most fields, it is unnecessary to set aside those in power every five years, otherwise it would do harm to the steady running of its business.
To sum up, there might be some compelling consequences under this policy, yet the negative consequences are much significant. Thus, we should not consider about changing the power in any field every five years without ruling out above circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: most
... change the power every five years. For most most growing firms, the first exigent issue ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'most' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: most
... change the power every five years. For most most growing firms, the first exigent issue ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07584269663 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71939564521 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1327522509 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.9375 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193016246458 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639448251566 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522059578869 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117000116877 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034753047188 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.