In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
The author of the statement claim that In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. While some may argue that this statement holds all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples in support of their claim. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claim.
Past achievement in a field plays a vital role in one's life to make a significant contribution to the field. Most of the time the future of an individual is dependent on their past achievement. An individual can play for his country or represent his country at international level only if he has past achievement in that field, for example, Indian cricketer Virat Kohli made his debut in the international cricket team because he has very good past track record and helped him in doing significantly well in his field. And if you look at the Olympic games, our players are made to practice extremely hard before qualifying for the Olympics. This level of skill doesn't come without prior success on the field.
Another reason why past success might be a strong indicator of future success can be the fact that past success is mostly only obtained by a series of trials and errors. These experiences teach us the meaning of failure and also teach us what our strengths and weaknesses are. It is only when we are more self-aware that we can do our best in whatever we do.
However, above two reasons might have hold true for most of the time but we cannot assert that without past achievement one cannot be successful in that field, For example, Indian Cricket team Former Captain MS Dhoni who is the most successful captain of India's cricket history had no prior experience of captaincy, he had never captained his team at domestic cricket. Success in the field depends on various factors such as hard work, determination, and luck. If one is determined to do something and can do hard work then he can be successful in that field without having experience in that field.
In a nutshell, we can say that without past achievements in a field one can or cannot make a significant contribution to that field as a success is a combination of hard work, determination, and luck.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...vement in a field plays a vital role in ones life to make a significant contribution...
^^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...g for the Olympics. This level of skill doesnt come without prior success on the field...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome without prior success on the field. Another reason why past success might be...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, well, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76480475563 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48635235732 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.262314197 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.266666667 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398045623393 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157041671785 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.221647756327 0.0758088955206 292% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2354410787 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107601988802 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.