In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In

Essay topics:

In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Important contributions in any field are possible to be achieved by people of all age groups; young inexperienced or old experienced people. It depends on various factors that a person is able to make an important contribution. In my opinion, a beginner, who is competent enough in any field is most likely to make important contributions in any field of inquiry as compared to experts.
A beginner who is competent enough in his or her field has a fresh mindset to see things such as innovative ideas, solutions to issues, etc. This allows the highly capable beginner to propose out of the box solutions for any problem. For instance, Steve Jobs as well as Bill Gates stated in an interview that they were the youngest in the meeting rooms when they started to pursue their dreams. Clearly, being the youngest in the company they proposed ideas that revolutionized the technological industry. Thus, beginners in any field who have strong grasp of knowledge in their area of work have higher potential than experts to make important contributions.
Continuing the above example, Steve Jobs further states in the interview that they became the oldest in the meeting rooms by the time their companies seemed to be culminated; Apple or Microsoft had been well established and had become a profitable business. The cooperation of talented young people being hired frequently in both the companies has enabled it to compete in the ever growing technology business. Therefore, novel contributions are mostly credited to young people in any field of inquiry.
Some people may argue that nothing can beat the experience gained by an expert of any field. While this may hold true, the notion that beginners look at things in a different perspective than experts grants beginners a great advantage because finding solutions for a problem in a novel approach, rather than the banal approach by the experts, is much more effective. For instance, the invention to reuse space shuttle launchers was recently invented by the fresh and young Elon Musk, before which the space shuttle launcher built by NASA was disposed off into the ocean and not recycled. Thus, again beginners with high skills often provide important contributions in any field.
From above, it is safe to conclude that beginners who display great competency in their fields are more likely to make important contributions as compared to the experts in the same field.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80499108733 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4476664017 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230911017574 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805956001337 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063744977366 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140063284648 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612134029519 0.0667264976115 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80499108733 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4476664017 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230911017574 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805956001337 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063744977366 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140063284648 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612134029519 0.0667264976115 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.