Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In my opinion, many important discoveries or inventions are not necessarily accidental, rather they require considerable focus and effort. I believe it is safe to purport that a few inventions in the past can be considered as accidental, which does not necessarily support the fact that seeking an answer to a specific question usually leads to answering another that we may come across.
To begin, history has not shown many important discoveries as being accidental. These discoveries were instead attained after diligent application of theories and design of experiments. For instance, the most famous invention of light bulb by Thomas Edison was possible after almost one thousand trials of experiments. Sir Edison did not accidently discover anything besides the light bulb, rather he learnt many ways of not making a light bulb. History has also shown more instances where the invention did not occur because of accident; the inventors discovered whatever they specifically intended. Such instances include the invention of airplane by Wright brothers, smartphones by Steve Jobs, etc.
In contrast to above discussion, proponents of the prompt may argue that notable inventions have been due to accidental discoveries. Sure, the invention of vaccine against bacteria was an accidental discovery. Sir Fleming returned after a week of vacation to his lab, just to observe an intriguing phenomenon on some samples, which he had forgotten to discard. This observation led him to analyze the suspicious characters of the sample and formulate a vaccine to kill bacteria. Such incidents to accidently discover something do rarely occur. Therefore, it is hard to say that seeking the answer to one question usually leads us to come across and answer another based on very few events. Had Sir Fleming not observed the strange characteristics of the sample, he would have not attained the vaccine discovery. Ostensibly, the possibility of such discoveries happening is minimal as compared to the discoveries that are not accidental, as elucidated in the above paragraph.
If it is true that many discoveries are accidental, it does not necessarily mean that seeking an answer to a specific question usually leads us to come across answer to a different one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 50
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 60
- It is more harmful to compromise one s own beliefs than to adhere to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 50
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32773109244 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01523669837 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53781512605 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6173933334 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.882352941 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244116028188 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725106892736 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966414261261 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184653523142 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887122755137 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.