Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A leader, during his or her period of leadership, may come across various scenarios where decision between a sound moral judgment and respect from his social circle is put to test. Such situations, although rarely occur, can define a leader's true colors; whether he chooses to gain the trust of his or her peers or chooses sound judgment. In my opinion, for a leader to effectively do his or he responsibilities, sound moral judgment should be kept as a higher priority than jeopardizing respect from the leader's peers.
To begin, a leader is most of the time elected to lead a team or any group of people. This is possible to happen after the leader acquires the trust of people, persuading them to vote for him by giving speeches, showing facts, giving incentives, taking oaths to grant justice, etc. People expect such a leader to deliver sound moral judgment, even if the leader's respect is put at risk from his or her peers. The leader would be betraying the trust of his or her people if the leader prioritizes the peer's respect. This may lead the people to start disliking the leader, which may in turn result in protests, riots, etc. Thus, a leader should practice sound moral judgment if such a negative output is expected from him. For instance, had the leaders not taken steps to grant justice for the family of the most recent incident of Black Lives Matter, the leaders of the state may have expected excessive riots or protests. Possibly the respect of the involved leaders from their peers was put at jeopardy, due to some haphazard decisions by the police force, as depicted in the media. Therefore, sound moral judgment is a very important characterstic of an effective leader.
Proponents of the prompt may argue that respect from peers allows the leader to take steps towards refuting an issue, which may become harder to achive due to lost respect. While it is true that this reasoning holds some water, another quality of an effective leader is to deal diligently to achieve the demands required of his or her peers. For instance, the captain of a police investigation requires evidences to be arranged in a specific manner but the person alloted this job is disrespectful to the leader due to past incidents. The captain may talk diplomatically with the person and get the work done. Thu=erefore,
Sound moral judgment is important in all scenarios, even when a leader's respect is being jeopardized from his or her peers. After all, the leader in most situations is elected by the people, who expect justice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
...ions, although rarely occur, can define a leaders true colors; whether he chooses to gain...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to sound'
Suggestion: to sound
...he trust of his or her peers or chooses sound judgment. In my opinion, for a leader t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific manner" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ation requires evidences to be arranged in a specific manner but the person alloted this job is disr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, for instance, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82568807339 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6319484411 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483944954128 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.354507682 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350791582758 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133747040092 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885097547145 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235869001392 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443542196057 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.