Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Instructions
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
An idea is not useful if efforts are not exerted to turn it into a reality. Some inventors in the past with revolutionary ideas, who have taken part in transforming the world into a more technological one, were ridiculed for their apparently absurd ideas. Unarguably, the inventors who have positively impacted the human society with innovative ideas have left a lasting legacy. Thus, I believe that people who work on their ideas to be success, ignoring the naysayers, are the ones who leave a lasting legacy.
History has shown many instances where innovators who worked diligently on their ideas were criticized or even ridiculed. Nonetheless, these innovators kept their hard work steady and did not quit because of public criticism. For example, the Wright Brothers;who invented the first flying vehile, wre harshly criticized by people. These people thought that the two Brothers were spending their time on a goal which seemed impossible to achieve and thus ridiculed. In the end, however, the Wright Brothers were successful to transform their idea into a reality. Moreover, they have left a lasting legacy in the field of aviation. Millions of people every year use air travel as a mode for long distance journeys. Therefore, those who focus on their ideas regardless of the criticism often leave a lasting legacy.
Ofcouse, criticisms cannpt be ignored if an idea is trimental to human society. For instance, the advent of nuclear power for everyday use is now heavily criticized due to the extreme hazards involved. A complete city can turn into a chaos, if anything goes wrong in the nuclear power plant. These type of ideas face heavy criticisms from people, who clearly hold hard evidences to support their arguments. Thus, if a person sees idea that may be potentially harmful for the human society, then the criticisms cannot be ignored.
Ideas that are beneficial to the development of the human society are sometimes criticized, or even ridiculed. Those innovators who ignore such criticisms and keep up their efforts, a potential lasting legacy can be attained if the idea is a success. However, the criticisms against a potentially precarious idea that may cause detrimental effect on humans should be taken inot account.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Ofcouse, criticisms cannpt be ignored if an idea is trimental to human society...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13387978142 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74804853136 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.744902408 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.95 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255757220339 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083875469144 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706158625323 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164850490242 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369660922737 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.