The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Human beings are tricky creatures that require interaction among themselves in order to thrive in a society. Little to no interaction results in anxiety or depression issues along with loads of other unwanted disorders. If parents need to raise a healthy child free of psychological disorders, they carefully need to take actions based on the child’s behavior. If a leader wants his company to be successful, he needs to enforce certain techniques to deal with his employees. The statement presumes the best way to teach is to praise positive actions, which works most of the time, however ignoring the negative ones completely is not acceptable. The negative actions from anyone need to dealt with as soon as possible.
Firstly, praising people for positive actions be it a kid or an old man builds up their confidence encouraging them to do even better in the future. This also impacts few of the surrounding people positively who observe the person being praised. They will strive to do the same in case any similar situations of work arise to earn the praise. For instance, Tom arrives at work always before his duty time which has impressed his boss for which someday Tom is praised for conspicuously by his boss. Next day onwards, Tom’s co-workers also start coming early to the job expecting the same to happen. Thus, praising creates a positive butterfly effect in an environment.
Negative actions depending on their intensity need to be resurrected accordingly. If the offense is small, ignoring could be the best option, however if they are consistent, repercussions is the way to go. In contrast, negative actions that are huge in magnitude undoubtedly cannot be ignored. If such deeds are ignored, people become strong in their evil actions and cause disruption in a society. In third world countries, thieves become strong in their actions as they are not correctly penalized at their first strike. They either escape the scene from police or if caught, their sentences are forgiven by bribes.
Sometimes ignoring the negative actions is the best. In situations where a person knows that he has done wrong and feels guilty for his actions, ignoring is the best alternative. After all, humans are not perfect and they need to be shown mercy. Proper repercussions need to be decided based on great wisdom of people in the past as well as present for the bad actions.
Praising builds a kid’s confidence and reprimanding him for his negative actions should be done depending on the magnitude of offense as discussed above. In conclusion, completely ignoring negative actions is not correct, at the same time praising positive actions in necessary in order for someone to effectively teach any person.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, third, thus, well, after all, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10444444444 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79118630472 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528888888889 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9898711307 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7083333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79166666667 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217433128698 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657490194009 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670298989151 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131603831729 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444246618699 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.