Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y

Essay topics:

Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Problems faced by the governments today if not resolved quick, may cause issues soon to the civilians as well as the health of a country or a state. Ruling parties should focus on solving current challenges rather than the anticipated problems of the future.

From plenty of famous quotes, the present is called as a gift and the future needs to be planned based on the present. If governments always focus on the future, they will probably miss out on the current demands of the people resulting in chaos of many lives. For instance, education is a crucial sector of a country’s growth and flourishment that requires instant solution in case any government is facing problems with it. Not fixing this issue immediately will negatively affect the overall future capabilities of the state. It is from education that we research and develop into civilized humans capable of facing challenges such as treating deadly diseases, counteract against economic issues, etc.

Undoubtedly, the future cannot be planned unless the present problems are cent percent dealt with because these persistent issues will always pop up in every discussions and not allow the high table to concentrate on the future. The press will constantly bug the government until the public gets a satisfactory answer to their current problems. Admittedly, the state’s think tank should be ready for anticipated future problems, however they should not waste time solving them if the magnitude of present issues are larger in comparison. The future becomes clear if current issues are resolved quick.

Worrying too much about the future is not recommended by many doctors. Humans cannot work if they are always stressed out which in turn reduces their daily work output by a huge amount. No matter how bad the future might seem, the present can be fixed which tremendously can give a positive affect on the future. If any government facing economic problems starts investing in a novel education sector, years from now its economy may triumph due to the increased educated people in the land.

The future needs to planned carefully considering all the present conditions of the government to not cause chaos. Also, to clearly focus on future anticipated problems, the current challenges must be resurrected. Therefore, governments should focus on solving current challenges rather than the anticipated problems of the future.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 292, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... which tremendously can give a positive affect on the future. If any government facing ec...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25839793282 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75487584445 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519379844961 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9941206937 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.055555556 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23499747893 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822089758009 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10363617988 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159221076347 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808147296957 0.0667264976115 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.