Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In my opinion, I believe educational institutions could inform students about fields they may likely face difficulties beyond their capabilities. However, students should not be dissuaded from pursuing any major of study without giving them a few chances.
To begin, any institution, prestigious or not, do not know the field of interest of any student. In fact, nobody but the student knows which major would be a suitable option of interest. Studies have shown that interest is one of the major driving forces that motivates anyone to accomplish their goals; let it be a student, professor, cop, etc. If a student who always wanted to become a pilot is dissuaded to pursue his or her ambition to become a pilot, and instead forced to join a business field of study, as persuaded by the institution. This dissuaded student in the future will not be an effective contributor to the business company he might work in because he or she will do all the work apathetically; without any interest and barely meet the assignments deadlines. Thus, if a student is forced to give up on his or her dreams during his education, he or she will likely face difficulties to cope up with jobs in the future, or even find it difficult to cope up with life.
In contrast, if a student is allowed to continue his or her field of study but the educational institution informs the student reasons leading the institutions to dissuade the student from his field, then such students would work their best to prove themselves. They can probably be asked to meet certain demands to continue pursuing their fields of study such as increasing GPA, doing extra assignments, etc. Now, the students who are really interested in their major will put great efforts to meet the afore-mentioned demands from the institution. Whereas, other students who are not really interested in their field will not put much effort. Such students can be dissuaded by the institution to not pursue their fields, as they are likely to not succeed. Thus, any institution can not directly dissuade any student to give up his or her major, instead they should be given a few chances to prove themselves as a good candidate for the field.
Students select their fields of study based on their interests. Imposing rules to dissuade such students from pursuing their dreams may hurt their careers. Thus, institutions cannot directly dissuade such students, rather giving them a few chances is a better alternative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 754, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'assignments'' or 'assignment's'?
Suggestion: assignments'; assignment's
...ithout any interest and barely meet the assignments deadlines. Thus, if a student is forced...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mentioned demands from the institution. Whereas, other students who are not really inte...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, so, then, thus, whereas, in contrast, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92788461538 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79359193158 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456730769231 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4005393826 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.588235294 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4705882353 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203984009397 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822199672474 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419288201097 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141240869851 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292339791498 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.