In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions
In the given issue, the author has compared the contributions of a beginner and an expert in the field of inquiry. The author believes that the beginner is likely to make more contributions than the expert. While I agree with the author, but there are some aspects that should be looked upon. The experience of the expert is something that the beginner can't possess through theoretical knowledge. Hence, the new perspectives of the beginner and the experience of an expert can both be a crucial part of the field of inquiry.
To begin with, most of us are aware of the famous series of investigation - 'Sherlock Holmes'. In the series, as well, though Sherlock is erudite in the field of investigations, sometimes, his friend helps him to solve cases. This is possible, because Sherlock may overlook certain clues or questions while following his process, but his friend had a completely different perspective, which helped to discover new facts. The same is true in real life inquiries as well. The beginner in any field sometimes raise questions which the experts fail to address. Therefore, beginners play an important role in the field of inquiry to open new possibilities.
Moving forward, if we talk about experts, they are an indispensable part of any system. The experts in the field of inquiry have their experiences as their assets which plays a very crucial part in the process of inquiries. They have dealt with numerous people and they know how people react to certain questions and when are they likely to lie. They even can judge the personalities and whether the person is telling the truth or lie in the first ten minutes of their interaction. This kind of expertise is something that can't be learned or passed on. This comes only and only through first-hand experiences. Therefore, the knowledge and experience of experts in the field of inquiry is something that can't be replaced.
To conclude, I would like to say that, the beginners and the experts, both have an important role to play in the field of inquiry. The beginner can't borrow experiences and knowledge from the experts and nor the experts can borrow new perspectives from the beginners. When both of them will work for hand in hand, we can expect better and rapid outcomes sometimes. For the field of inquiry, it is important to provide exposure to both the beginners as well as the experts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e expert is something that the beginner cant possess through theoretical knowledge. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...his kind of expertise is something that cant be learned or passed on. This comes onl...
^^^^
Line 5, column 704, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the field of inquiry is something that cant be replaced. To conclude, I would l...
^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y in the field of inquiry. The beginner cant borrow experiences and knowledge from t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... provide exposure to both the beginners as well as the experts.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, kind of, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87901234568 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75904729284 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471604938272 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0374340764 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.8181818182 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4090909091 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374348930664 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111254546857 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126645623756 0.0758088955206 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214030230041 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885743174022 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.