In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any field of inquiry, research, etc. it is not always the case that a beginner makes more important contributions than an experienced person or an expert.
If we consider a field of research in which experience plays a big role then surely the expert is the one to make important contributions in the field. For example, identifying areas which are quake prone is the job of an expert, who has been the same field for years and not any tyro who has just entered the field.
Also if we consider various other fields like quantum physics, archelogy, etc. which require a lot of expertise then it is the expert who comes into play whilst making important decisions and contributions to the field.
Contrary to the above explanations, sometimes a beginner could also be helpful and make some very important contributions. For example in the medical field, the invention of new medicines can also be done by beginners if their knowledge is sufficient for it. If we consider the Covid-19 pandemic then not only the experts but also the beginners will have a great hand in the development of a vaccine because no one has the idea or the knowledge required to make the vaccine for this virus. Similarly we can also cite upon the invention of light. Edinson had no idea how to do it and was not an expert in the field of electricity or light but that contribution of his has proved to be one of the greatest inventions of all time.
Having expertise in a field is always an excellent achievement and these people are more likely to make important contributions in their respective fields. Whereas, even if someone is a beginner they can make contributions to the field if they put in a lot of hard work and effort.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... an experienced person or an expert. If we consider a field of research in whic...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...tyro who has just entered the field. Also if we consider various other fields lik...
^^^^
Line 7, column 491, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...red to make the vaccine for this virus. Similarly we can also cite upon the invention of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, then, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66776315789 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.790030279 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4708090367 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.153846154 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252039260003 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100953442512 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541560849823 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167002552755 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384979188433 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.