in any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions
We often see, a typical scenario, in which a person unrelated to any field gives more appealing point of view that a person who has worked in the respective field. We always ask a third party person about suggestions which are very crucial and helps us to improve any decision. But the major work is obviously done by the person who has experience itself.
There are so many situations, especially important ones, where we go and take any expert's advice. Many students nowadays plans to do their masters abroad. But actually going in another country, living there, completely new to the environment is a very crucial decision of life. Students do not rely on any fleeting news or any beginner's suggestions. They go for an expert opinion, an expert's contribution will always be more important one.
Running a country is not an easy task. It is not any ordinary person's cup of tea. It requires passion, hard work, knowledge and most important, experience! The same reason must be behind the age limit on any prime minister or president or any representative. Being aged does not mean necessarily having experience but it is the basic thought of having an experience. Any 20-30 year old representative will be a novice person to have the post. The contributions in taking critical decisions, expert is required.
Moreover, if any person is sick, it is always advisable to go to a doctor. Will we go to a tyro doctor, who has just started learning or go to a doctor who is experienced or is an expert? An experienced contribution in helping our sickness will be given by an expert only.
In agriculture, to determine productivity of a crop, to evaluate an unknown disease and in many fields an expert is more likely to give major contributions than a beginner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...mportant ones, where we go and take any experts advice. Many students nowadays plans to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...ions. They go for an expert opinion, an experts contribution will always be more import...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, moreover, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 304.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81907894737 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91683958563 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0210207112 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3888888889 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27196340349 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816094060105 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761680541567 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155220832476 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704881941048 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.