In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
A novice is transmuted to an expert or professional after a long struggle journey. It is not a candid task to render a significant contribution without possessing adequate expertise. In the prompt, it is asserted that the newcomers are contributing more than the erudite scholar in the field of inquiry. However, I do not endorse the statement, and my reasons are illustrated with attributes.
To begin with, it is not a facile work that the years of experienced researchers could be defeated by the tyros who have barely gained proficiency. Even though a new scholar could provide an unimaginable result, it is not possible without the guidance of the connoisseur. For instance, Aristotle did not become the father of the scientific method overnight he started to inquire and experiment. He was a student of Plato and acquired mastery flawlessly before he contributed his findings to the world. Thus, an amateur can not simply disclose vital findings without proper instructions: first, they have to obtain skills that made them an expert, then they will be able to unveil the unimaginable discoveries.
Secondly, it is true that at the beginning, a tyro is always enthusiastic to learn things and some could accomplish in a few years. But, the acceleration of discovering noble work could not label him a novice who made an important contribution. Because he has already leveled up before it. For example, Frederick G. Banting won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for ‘the discovery of insulin' at only 32 years of age. Although his achievement came earlier, people can not contend that he was a beginner when he discovered insulin.
Thirdly, a professional can delay to provide outcomes as they work on more complicated projects. Taking more time does not make professionals' findings less significant. For example, Charles Darwin took 20 years to publish his groundbreaking theory of evaluation. His theory is world-known and renowned. So, important contributions can not weight with time boundaries.
In conclusion, it is not credible that beginners are proficient to generate more contributions than experts. Also, guidelines of professionals are needed for the novice to inquire in any field. It is gullible to state that any early accomplishments are possible without adequate knowledge that a beginner can not possess.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to journey'
Suggestion: to journey
...t or professional after a long struggle journey. It is not a candid task to render a si...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ice who made an important contribution. Because he has already leveled up before it. Fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'delay providing'.
Suggestion: delay providing
...nsulin. Thirdly, a professional can delay to provide outcomes as they work on more complicat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24734042553 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16279543359 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577127659574 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6792251454 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7826086957 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.347826087 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204815702924 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539415692866 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715123323676 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125306066167 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899887149926 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.