Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
A curriculum means a full following instruction for the students about courses which needs to be well-organized and efficient so that it can provide standard education. The prompt suggests that curricula should be created according to the students' preferences rather than an educator making it for them. Although in some ways the choice of students making syllabus can be helpful, I don't agree that it should be constructed entirely based on their wants.
To begin with, students may not have a clear knowledge that what are the best topics to include in the curricula; they may have only a vague idea about the subject which could lead to a crucial unorganized syllabus. For example, a computer science freshman who has no previous knowledge of the course wants to learn famous platforms like machine learning; he or she only found out from the internet that some themes of machine learning are very attractive and without knowing the difficulty level and chronological patterns, he or she wants to include those in his/her course. However, if his or her course structure is allowed to be learned, it may perplex the student and leave him or her in an incomprehensible situation. As a result, the whole course would be futile as the student mostly did not get a clear concept of the topics.
Secondly, the curricula made by different students can make it difficult for the educator to offer as there is a chance of differences in preference. For example, one student wants to add theoretical topics and on the other hand, another student wants experimental subjects. Hence, the disparate choices could overwhelm the teacher about what should teach, and to satisfy all students, he can deliver only slight ideas on those topics. Also, the educator will find it difficult to get a larger number of instructors to deliver the students' made syllabus. In the end, it will be a disastrous environment for both the institute and the students.
Finally, though it is difficult to incorporate all the topics according to the students' wants, some of the most inclusive choices can be added. Because the common interest they have in the topics can help them to understand well as they are curious about it. For example, it is often time seen that most of the students presume that there will be laboratory classes which are very common in other institutes, but later find out there will be only theoretical lectures which can make them disappointed and vanish their interest. Therefore, the educator can provide some options to the students that can incline with others so that they don't lose attentiveness.
In conclusion, the curriculum should be created in such a way to be best for the students so that they receive effective education, not the students' different vague preferences. However, the educator can offer some choices in order to attract and satisfy learners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...dents making syllabus can be helpful, I dont agree that it should be constructed ent...
^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'clear knowledge'.
Suggestion: clear knowledge
... To begin with, students may not have a clear knowledge that what are the best topics to includ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 838, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not get a clear concept of the topics. Secondly, the curricula made by differen...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 636, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...at can incline with others so that they dont lose attentiveness. In conclusion, t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...e students different vague preferences. however, the educator can offer some choices in...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... order to attract and satisfy learners.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2399.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00835073069 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77236241301 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473903966597 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.761861967 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.277777778 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6111111111 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183888251576 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065741516324 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354674447003 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117193587844 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155897004334 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.