In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
P#1
In our conventional thought, most people believe that the expert is more likely to make important contributions than beginners. However, with the rapid growth of a variety kinds of fields of inquiry, we found that more and more beginners began to surpass those ‘old men’, which leads to a heat discussion in society. From my perspective, I hold the view that nowadays beginners indeed are more likely to make important contributions than expert, arguments are as follow:
P#2
Firstly, the beginners are more open and easier to accept new idea than expert. In any field of inquiry, the born of fresh idea with the use of modern technology always happens. For those who are expert, they have explored this field in traditional ways for such a long time that they can hardly adapt a totally new way to continue his research. But for beginners, they would accept the new style naturally thus keep up with the step of the development of inquiry. An typical example is that my teacher of real analysis is an old professor who is about 70 years old, he is an expert in analysis but he cannot use modern technology very well. He doesn’t like using computer thus always do calculation by hands. However, nowadays we can use all sorts of tools like MATLAB or PYTHON to get the solution, which saves our time and make the calculation more accurate, making it possible to do research further in those area where enormous calculation are required and make great contribution.
P#3
What’s more, the beginners are also more innovative, as they are always younger and have less stereotype. A beginner is like a piece of blank paper, more blank space means more directions and more opportunities, while the expert has fixed their direction which is really hard to achieve more contributions. Nowadays most of fields have been explored thoroughly, but with the innovation of beginners, they can develop brandy new branches to conduct inquiry, giving them more probability to make important contributions.
P#4
Some people may argue that expert have more knowledge than beginners and is more familiar with their field as they have research on it a lot. However, the use of internet and so on technologies enables beginners to get access to professional knowledge easier thus they could be familiar with the field quickly as long as they want. But innovation cannot be trained so easily as it happens more often when we are exposes to the knowledge for the first time. So we can conclude that the beginners perform better than expert in making important contributions.
P#5
So, we should change the conventional thought that the expert is always more likely to make great contribution, and perhaps whatever the truth is, only believe in this can we beginners have more confidence and courage to explore the field which seems quite unfamiliar to us. I am greatly convinced that in the future more and more beginners will make great contributions, pushing the development of field of inquiry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ontributions than expert, arguments are as follow: P#2 Firstly, the beginners are more ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 466, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...the step of the development of inquiry. An typical example is that my teacher of r...
^^
Line 4, column 908, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...g it possible to do research further in those area where enormous calculation are required...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 317, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the fields') or simply say ''most fields''.
Suggestion: most of the fields; most fields
...to achieve more contributions. Nowadays most of fields have been explored thoroughly, but with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, really, so, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2496.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96222664016 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74422442235 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473161033797 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9182578757 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9444444444 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451408856278 0.243740707755 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161492810232 0.0831039109588 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122241915998 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300026576597 0.150359130593 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101719361091 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.