The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones

P#1
Teaching is vital for a society as it cultivates talents who will be the future backbone of society, so the way of teaching should be discussed cautiously. As the consciousness of human equal rights has been wakened, more and more people are calling for a transformation of the way of teaching, which means praise positive actions and ignore negative ones while teaching. But is it truly do good to the educates? From my perspective, I hold the view that although positive actions should be praised, the negative ones shouldn’t be ignored for there may be educational values too. The reasons are as follows:
P#2
Firstly, I agree with the frontal part of the issue that positive actions should be praised. Children are too young and their brains are too immature that right and complete worldviews haven’t been set up, under this circumstance they would prefer those things which bring to positive feedbacks, so the duty of providing students with positive feedbacks on the right things falls on teachers. If teacher praise students for as many kinds things as possible such as helping others without asking for returns, or even simple helping parents do housework at home, they would tend to conduct those things more, leading to a good manner and thus well-educated talents are made. But when we don’t encourage them, they may feel bored and turn into things that is more thrilling like electronic games or just lay in bed, which is what we are unwilling to see. From above we can see that the praise of positive actions is of great necessity.
P#3
However, when we praise students, we should also be aware of that educates may can gain a lot from negative actions too, which indicates that they shouldn’t be neglected. Being the opposite of knowing what should be done, it is equal essential for students to make clear that what shouldn’t be done, and that’s where criticize on negative behaviors plays its role. Most of negative things may occurred by accident but if we don’t stop them, students will fall into the mud of astray before they know. Examples are everywhere and deplorable, a typical example is that many teenagers became addicted to electronic devices due to the breach of duty of parents who didn’t point out the hazard to children and prevent them in time. So, we can conclude that only we make the line of forbidden zone explicit to students and protect them from things that could ruin their future can we fulfill our duty as educators. Therefore, ignorance of negative actions can be equal to crime and we should avert this happening.
P#4
What’s more, in the view of philosophy, the unity of opposite is the fundamental of the universe, only considering one side would cause imbalance to life. We cannot deny that the punishment or education of negative actions may let students especially teenagers feel unhappy or even angry, but the proportion of negative feelings and the pain gained through the correction of corrupt customs in life shouldn’t be forgotten and students sooner or later need to face them when they enter adulthood, thus let them learn to deal with negative feeling and exercise their will power for overcoming bad habits should be encouraged in education.
P#5
In a word, we should reach a balance on praise and criticize but definitely not ignore the negative side. I am strongly convinced that students should learn to accept criticize while receiving praise, and that will help them become truly talents who will accelerate the speed of nation to prosperous.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2949.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 596.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94798657718 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94096258147 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60193896354 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496644295302 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 901.8 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.6423620311 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.210526316 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3684210526 23.4991977007 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232658251954 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861200549646 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844071892361 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144214361464 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932890258389 0.0667264976115 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.