In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
When it comes to the premise of inquiry of any field, a beginner has a fresh perspective that is malleable. A beginner can make observations that may have crossed the expert’s mind because of redundancy but an expert is definitely well versed in their field of inquiry and can contribute more to that particular topic of discussion when compared to a beginner.
The beginner is always curious, and their mind is open to interpretation. They spend their time delving into the subject matter and trying to find any new information related to their field of interest. Hence, there is always a flow of new information from the beginner. Any field of inquiry keeps evolving, forcing the expert to also put in more efforts to understand the developments in their field. Most of the knowledge is always passed on from an expert to a beginner, contributing to the growth and enhancing the knowledge of the beginner in a field. For instance, in medical school, each group of interns is assigned a mentor who is an experienced doctor. The interns are fresh out of medical school with good proficiency in medicine and surgery but lack heuristic experience. Even though they make suggestions as to how to go about an operation or diagnose a condition, they need to make scrutinised observations of the methods followed by the expert before they are given any hands-on opportunity. In order to become a expert in the medical field, the interns have years of learning to do before mastering related skills.
There is always a foundation that is bolstered by layers of new information. This important foundation for a beginner is built by an expert. The expert is the catalyst to the beginners learning process. They start from the basics and at each level of advancement, there is acquisition and application of new information. A beginner is not well equipped with enough experience to bring about this learning curve on their own. An expert is always lending a helping hand. For instance, in the corporate world, a set of employees report to their manager, the boss. This person is termed “the boss” because they are quite literally, the head. They were once a beginner and have gone through levels of experience and learning to earn that term. Obviously, they will have a lot to contribute to the beginners learning and the beginner even considers the boss as their role model. Whatever new information is come across is put forth by the boss for approval because they almost always know what is best.
In conclusion, every beginner has great potential to become an expert in their field of interest. In order to achieve that, the expert helps them at each steppingstone, paving the path to expertise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1026, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ands-on opportunity. In order to become a expert in the medical field, the intern...
^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... the catalyst to the beginners learning process. They start from the basics and at each...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, may, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2246.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.903930131 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83060056112 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458515283843 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5942145908 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5833333333 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.79166666667 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165761625227 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530413732114 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454768297419 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117660146885 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421581849818 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.