In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions

Any research work requires a person to have a sound knowledge of the basic and fundamental concepts of the field in concern. Having said that, it is not the main factor to be considered while evaluating the contribution of a person to a field of inquiry.

An expert in a field of work is necessarily a person of years of experience, in-depth knowledge and sound understanding of the field. So, it can be said that he has worked in the field for many years, thus exhausting his brain with all the years of thinking and reasoning. Therefore any new advancements and opportunities emerging in the field will be less eagerly looked upon. But, the same newer opportunities will be much more curiously looked at and introspected by the novices which are eager to take in as much knowledge as they can. Thus, bringing in a broader vision and investigation to unravel the complexities in the subject of study. Therefore, the experts are less likely to be able to think up explanations about any new mysteries and phenomenons in the concerned field than the beginners.

A beginner's mind will be like an empty book to fill.By this, it means that he will be in a position to understand and interpret any matter according to his imagination and perception. In any field of work, imagination plays a great role in the unraveling of confounding matters by the power of reasoning.A person who knows not too much about his subject of interest is bound to use imagination and ideas to come up with new solutions and ideas to the unending questions in the field.The best example of this is in the field of science, where critical reasoning is the major aspect of the theories related to cosmic space and the life sciences. And by far it has always been observed that young and developing minds are better at working up ideas and solutions more rapidly in the field of inquiry.

Moreover, experts who have studied in the specific field for a great expanse of time have some of the presumptions based on the time when they started studying as a novice. Some of the theories they assumed at that time may show contradictory implications after many years. In such a case it would be actually difficult for them to accept the new paradigm and transform their old beliefs which they nurtured so long. At such a time the newer learners in this fields would be more advantageous and would be in a state to make new discoveries and perceptions explained as they would not be burdened by any previously held notions.They are after all still on their to be called experts.

Hence, it can be concluded that though experts have played an important role in the field of inquiry for long, they are more significant to guiding the beginners in their contributions to the field than themselves making new and important contributions.After all, the curiosity of a beginner's mind is can bring up much more possibilities and perspectives than the worn out minds of the experts.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ll the years of thinking and reasoning. Therefore any new advancements and opportunities ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 699, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he experts are less likely to be able to think up explanations about any new myst...
^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...mind will be like an empty book to fill.By this, it means that he will be in a pos...
^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...nding matters by the power of reasoning.A person who knows not too much about his...
^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... to the unending questions in the field.The best example of this is in the field of...
^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... field for a great expanse of time have some of the presumptions based on the time when the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...when they started studying as a novice. Some of the theories they assumed at that time may ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow contradictory implications after many years. In such a case it would be actual...
^^
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...paradigm and transform their old beliefs which they nurtured so long. At such a t...
^^
Line 7, column 457, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...g. At such a time the newer learners in this fields would be more advantageous and w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 631, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...burdened by any previously held notions.They are after all still on their to be call...
^^^^
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
... making new and important contributions.After all, the curiosity of a beginners mind ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, after all, as to, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 513.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75438596491 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91286517747 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463937621832 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.400895632 60.3974514979 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.4375 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0625 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315371762821 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982411158247 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879319158892 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187385294231 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909830166751 0.0667264976115 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.