In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions?

Essay topics:

In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions?

Flegdling, by definition, is that which people describes as a person who does have any relevant experience before working on a specific job.While some argue that the neopghyte has more possibilities to contribute to the essential decisions, others assert that beginner has no conributions to any decisions. The novice with relevant knowledge might have some creative ideas to bolster making the important decision,whereas it is not possible that beginner would be more likely having more conributions to a important decision if one was not granded as much relevant experience as the expert do. After weighting the evidence, it is clear that the expert have more advantages contributing to the important decisions or technologies than the beginner.
Those who aver that the beginners have fresh minds, not afraid of attampting creative ideas. Moreover, the experts working on a particular career tend to be more conventional and refrain themselves from more challenging ideas or constructive attampts. However, although the beginners have been grounded basic knowledge, the theoractical practise is really different from theorcatical knowledge. The person who work on a specific job for years is undoubtly more reliable than a beginner who is taking over the work. More precisely, theoritical practise is, on a small scale,the microcosm of the entire process, which is far more important than the conceptional knowledge.
Consider the example of the development of the Modern Physics, particularly in Quntam Mechanics, for instance. The world that beginners faces in quntam mechanics is capricious and completely different from what they learned from textbooks, thought they have been grounded relevant conceptions. That is why the experts have to lead them step by step to accumulate the experience and consequently, have a general idea what they are confronting. More importantly, in nuclear physics, the experts have, on the basis of their previous experiments better understanding on which area is considered to be dangerous and out of the current discovery scope, which is not the case for beginners.
In final analysis, the experts is,to large extent, the pioneers and the guidence of the beginners. The beginners have, on the basis of scientific logics, to follow the specialists' work and enhance them with further progress.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...rience before working on a specific job.While some argue that the neopghyte has more ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
...to bolster making the important decision,whereas it is not possible that beginner would ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 505, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...more likely having more conributions to a important decision if one was not grand...
^
Line 2, column 572, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...heoritical practise is, on a small scale,the microcosm of the entire process, which ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , to
...ners. In final analysis, the experts is,to large extent, the pioneers and the guid...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, really, so, whereas, while, as to, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46537396122 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09377981043 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529085872576 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4231863445 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.928571429 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7857142857 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291948754132 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096189732641 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767152272907 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166251708214 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111268869045 0.0667264976115 167% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.