In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any field of inquiry, whether it may be science or technology, the beginners are more likely to make important contributions within their field compared to experts. History has a way of showing that notable people who were not experts in their fields have contributed to advancements. While it may not be true that experts do not make important contributions, the contributions of beginners are more notable than the experts.
In the field of science, formidable contributions have been made from beginners rather than experts. For instance, Eratosthenes discovered the circumference of the earth just by using sticks to measure a certain angle of the world. He used his footsteps from one point to another to determine the measure of an angle and to calculate the circumference of the earth. Eratosthenes was no expert in the field of mathematics, however, his inquiries and calculations regarding the circumference of the earth proved accurate with the lack of advanced technology used. Hence, his mathematical contributions are widely used in basic geometry classes. Additionally in the field of science is Rosland Franklin who discovered the structure of the DNA. Rosalind Franklin was not an expert in the field of science, yet with the use of technology she was able to determine the structure. Rosalind Franklin made a major contribution in the field of science, in which the structure and role of DNA is vital in medications, treatments, and laboratory work.
In the field of technology, beginners have made formidable contributions to modern day advances. For instance, Henry Ford was no expert in the field of technology. However, his efforts to create the first car layed a foundation for several generations to advance in the models of cars. If it weren’t for Henry Ford, then there may have been a delay or halt in the advancement of transportation. Likewise in the field of technology, Steve Jobs made authentic contributions. Steve Jobs did not create the first computer, nor the first phone. However, his Apple products proved the advances in technology were endless. Steve Jobs contributed to the advancement of computer based technology and even advanced further altered the appearance of a phone. Furthermore, Steve Jobs was no expert in the beginning, however, he was able to make contributions that demonstrated his advancement in technology that later made him an expert in the field.
While it may be true that beginners are more likely to make contributions in their fields, some may argue that it is not true. It could be argued that experts are more likely to make contributions. For example, Albert Einstein was an expert in the field of science. Over time he was able to provide not just math formulas, such as E=MC^2, but he was able to advance in technology, such as the atomic bomb. In this sense, experts are more likely to make contributions since they hold years of knowledge. However, years of experience do not compare to the ability to make contributions, in which beginners are prime examples that demonstrate more contributions than others.
In conclusion, beginners are more likely to make contributions in their fields. While experts are also more likely to make valuable contributions, it does not compare to the beginners’ abilities to make contributions, which are more notable and recognized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 644, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
... widely used in basic geometry classes. Additionally in the field of science is Rosland Fran...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...t in the advancement of transportation. Likewise in the field of technology, Steve Jobs ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, may, regarding, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2809.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 544.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16360294118 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.148908863 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.395220588235 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 900.0 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.802663358 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.321428571 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10714285714 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240678741988 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796583792689 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617091029915 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169718544004 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573088655178 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.