In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be

Leadership alternation appears to be a routine in diverse organizations. Indeed, when fresh troops of senior executives or officials succeed their predecessors, dynamic and innovative strategies may be put forward and faster progress is liable to ensue. Conversely, suppose an ineffective leading team always remains unaltered, the success of an enterprise may be at stake. Given this, I genuinely approve of the necessity for leaders whose terms have expired to hand over their power to those who are more capable of making a difference. Nonetheless, as for prominent leaders, they are entitled to serve for a longer period.

On the one hand, newly-appointed leaders are emboldened to bring forth positive and thorough changes to justify their superiority over their precursors. Anyhow, “a new broom sweeps clean.” Normally, soon after they assume office, radical reforms that facilitate better operation may be sketched out and then strictly enforced. Regarding institutions that aim to snatch and fortify a dominant status within their respective fields, timely reformation is much desired. In other words, the mission of new leadership is of supernal worth to the promising future of an organization. This is determined by the heightened demand for strategic revitalization as well as miscellaneous exterior impacts. For example, in many countries around the world, top government leaders, including the president, the prime minister, the foreign minister, and other high-ranking officials, are jointly elected to serve for one or at two terms. Each term of service largely extends over 4 or 5 years. Meanwhile, relevant laws and regulations empower smooth leadershipsubstitutions at the national level. As a consequence, all leaders should fully appreciate the essentiality of a finite term. By making the wisest use of this precious length of time, they shall be able to make their marks on the history of their organizations.

Mr. Xi Jinping, a widely-acclaimed politician, was elected President of China in 2013. Ever since the accession of new leadership, the Chinese people have profoundly sensed desirable changes taking place in different aspects of life. In his inaugural speech, President Xi vowed to crack down on corruption and curb waste. So far, the comprehensive Anti-corruption Campaign has been sternly implemented and frugality advocated nationwide. Being a man of his words, President Xi initiated daring cases against many former top officials once involved in corruption-related scandals. To intensify such efforts, he even delegated “centrally-dispatched inspection teams” to conduct in-depth investigations on public officials. When it comes to economic reforms, a new policy was intended to reduce the government’sparticipation in capital distribution and restructure state-owned enterprises. Undoubtedly, the entire nation is thankful for this laudable leadership subrogation and embraces firm confidence to realize the magnificent “Chinese Dream”.

On the other hand, some instances substantiate prolonged terms of office. Witnessing the emergence of predominant leaders, particularly entrepreneurs, we should by no means underrate the irreplaceable role they play in administrating their ventures. Though starting from scratch, they have gradually constructed unrivaled leading forces that may function well for a much longer period. It was Konosuke Matsushita who founded Panasonic in 1917. Without any capital or manufacturing experience at the very beginning, he resolved to carry forward his business endeavor. Having gone through many years of assiduous struggle, he finally boosted his company to be one of the world’s largest manufacturers of electrical products, which certifies Matsushita’s remarkable capability as a business leader. He remained active and powerful in Panasonic's operation right until his complete retirement in 1973. He deserves more time in power.

To sum up, the effectiveness of an organization can be restored or upgraded through leadership switches on suitable occasions. That is to say, most leaders are supposed to work for a restricted length of time. In the process, if their leadership techniques exhibit certain drawbacks, a reliable way is to revitalize the situation by selecting brand-new leaders. After all, only those who manage to attain the highest efficiency are likely to hold their power as long as possible.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, well, while, after all, as for, for example, as well as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 95.0 58.6224719101 162% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3790.0 2235.4752809 170% => OK
No of words: 656.0 442.535393258 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77743902439 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.06087906887 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56430343793 2.79657885939 127% => OK
Unique words: 409.0 215.323595506 190% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623475609756 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 1189.8 704.065955056 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8776545136 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7428571429 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31428571429 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 26.0 10.2758426966 253% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0702493808944 0.243740707755 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0161403539865 0.0831039109588 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0176809990835 0.0758088955206 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0410955620574 0.150359130593 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116539313232 0.0667264976115 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.1639044944 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.38706741573 125% => OK
difficult_words: 248.0 100.480337079 247% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.