In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Answer-
Any situation in life can have different points of view depending upon the way of interpretation of its observer. From an optimistic point of view, a glass may be half full but from a pessimistic point of view, the glass is half empty. Any observer’s interpretation of any situation completely depends upon several complex factors like past experiences, present conditions, and many other yet unthought factors. In the above prompt people’s opinions should be taken seriously as a valuable contribution to the progress, even though, they contrast the situation. In my opinion, I mostly agree that in order to be making progress, the people’s contrasting points of view should be taken seriously for three reasons,
To begin, contrasting past experiences, should be considered before making decisions. It helps to make better analyses and predict the different aspects of the ramifications of the situations.
For instance, in a recent board meeting about shifting the nation’s energy source from natural-based energy to nuclear power plants, many political pundits suggested that it will bring a malignant effect on their nations. Though in the present-day world, the nuclear power plant is most of the first world country’s main source of energy, the Chornobyl disaster is not unbeknown to anyone and many more nuclear disaster was recorded during the past decade. This example illustrates that sometimes analyzing contrasting views may help to make better decisions. Contrasting opinions from a veteran may sometimes help to analyze situations more correctly since people with more experience have more points of view and they had faced the problems concerning with after-effects of the decision. If one assumes that contrasting points of view are only inhibited progress and chose to ignore the portends, then they will do so at their own peril.
Furthermore, considering people’s ideas from both points of view is a comparatively better idea. In the democratic world, people's opinions matter. Before making decisions about something, people’s points of view should be taken into account since, after all, they are the backbone of some democracy, and mostly they will face problems on a regular basis if anything happens in the future because of the implementation of the decision. For instance, bad traffic jams caused more than 300 accidents over the past year. The government decided to add an extra lane to reduce the traffic jam without taking any advice from the people. In this scenario, people may be more aware of the real situation regarding the traffics in the city. Maybe according to the people bad traffic rules and poor road conditions are the main cause for the most of the accidents. They also reported that punishment for flouting traffic rules is skimpy. Thus adding an extra lane may not help in the future. This example illustrates that people's opinion matters since they face real-life situations and know more about the problem on daily basis. Listening to people’s opinions may be better to make decisions about something, that after all the decision will help the people in the future. Thus ignoring people’s opinions about some present-day situations will not be a very good idea.
In the conclusion, people’s contrasting opinions on every situation are very complex and convoluted matters. Which opinion is helpful and which is not depends on several factors. This may be very difficult to conclude, whether people contacting opinions should be taken into account.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...pends upon several complex factors like past experiences, present conditions, and many other yet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...hree reasons, To begin, contrasting past experiences, should be considered before making dec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 52, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...metimes peoples opinions matter but not always. Sometimes peoples opinions are based o...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 377, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...rk. In other words, we should listen to peoples preferences based on the situation. For...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, then, third, thus, after all, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 121.0 58.6224719101 206% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4047.0 2235.4752809 181% => OK
No of words: 761.0 442.535393258 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31800262812 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.25225936605 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82825007419 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 326.0 215.323595506 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42838370565 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1239.3 704.065955056 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.2370786517 183% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4963023186 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.378378378 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5675675676 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81081081081 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148185948008 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432102578384 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334412716876 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088877524024 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435365804425 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 100.480337079 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...pends upon several complex factors like past experiences, present conditions, and many other yet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...hree reasons, To begin, contrasting past experiences, should be considered before making dec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 52, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...metimes peoples opinions matter but not always. Sometimes peoples opinions are based o...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 377, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...rk. In other words, we should listen to peoples preferences based on the situation. For...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, then, third, thus, after all, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 121.0 58.6224719101 206% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4047.0 2235.4752809 181% => OK
No of words: 761.0 442.535393258 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31800262812 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.25225936605 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82825007419 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 326.0 215.323595506 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42838370565 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1239.3 704.065955056 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.2370786517 183% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4963023186 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.378378378 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5675675676 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81081081081 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148185948008 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432102578384 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334412716876 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088877524024 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435365804425 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 171.0 100.480337079 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.