Discussion and deliberation are key to taking progressive decisions. Progress be it in any aspect of world affairs such as science, literature, religion or philosophy has relied on discussion and debate for centuries. The prompt suggests the same that progress in any situation is guided by a debate between opposing views. The thought is undoubtedly justified as contrast has always bought nuanced clarity. It is only when different sides of an issue start heavily touting their opinions and refuting others that we can reach a conclusion that can be relied upon. Upon careful deliberation by different views on a common topic, several unique views are brought to the topic, this ensures no aspect is left untouched about an issue before a solution is reached. Though it is claimed to be time-consuming, it is also true that decisions taken in haste are not fruitful.
The debate has been the foundation of progress in any field. The very nature of debate ensures this by strongly incentivizing each side to tout its opinion and refute the other's opinion on grounds of logic. It is only through debate that different conflicting nuances of an issue are brought forth by each side. In the times of famous astronomers such as Galileo and Cornspicious, the debate ensued about the revolution of the earth: whether the earth revolves around the sun or the sun revolves around the earth. This ` controversial view that the earth revolved around the sun was advocated by Galileo and Cornspicious which was not quite popular among the established thought that the world revolved around the earth. The debate that followed complemented by observations and experiments conducted by the two scientists established that earth revolved around the sun, progressing the sciences of that time.
Discussions and debates are taken up by different parties and usually different opinions are brought forth by opposite sides. This multifaceted discussion ensures that no stone is ever left unturned. Since all aspects of an issue are thoroughly discussed no point of contention is left after a conclusion is reached. This makes the decision reached from a debate of opposing sides reliable. Marinda, the not-for-profit research institute, recently surveyed how important breakthroughs in since were achieved in the past 300 years. The results of the survey concluded that all breakthroughs of the past had relied upon the most careful of deliberations for 95% of all important breakthroughs and decisions taken into consideration.
It is well-known that deliberations and discussions are quite lengthy. Many times swift decisions are favored and deliberations are viewed as unnecessary. However, it must not be forgotten that quick discussions often lead to unfavorable results. Most autocratic states are a testimony to this thought. Most autocrats involve themselves in unnecessary micromanagement and take imprudent decisions on a whim. These decisions pile up with time and lead to the collapse of their empires. Recently, an autocratic country in the east collapsed on its debt that it owed itself. The country had to capitalize on the real estate boom and incentivized loans to real estate firms. These firms took several times more loans and did not deliver projects on time. What followed was firms declaring themselves bankrupt followed by banks and then the nation was finally consumed by chaos. What we need to understand is that time spent on discussions and debate is not wasted but rather well consumed.
In conclusion, we can say that debate and discussion are key to progressive developments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...side to tout its opinion and refute the others opinion on grounds of logic. It is only...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, then, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3033.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 575.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2747826087 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99112436263 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47652173913 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 939.6 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7308054161 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8387096774 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5483870968 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.29032258065 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116995708024 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348495250573 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372568407165 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723716928469 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253408103107 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.