To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
In today's world there are hardly any people who maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. It basically means that everyone is susceptible to venality and threats. The ethics and morals a person shows very much depends on the environment one was raised in and also by the outside influence one for instance the company he maintains. The prompt states that in order to be an efficacious leader, a public official has to have the highest ethical and moral standards. I mostly disagree with the statement for the following three reasons, however I do concede that this is a very difficult situation to evaluate.
Firstly, being moral and ethical may not produce the most effective results all the time, one must keep in mind to deceive in order to reach the final goal at a faster pace. For instance any Public official who wants to ensure he wins by a considerable margin in the next elections must ensure that the fellow people who are taking part in the campaigns knows that he is in a precarious position as proposed by him so they will put more effort in campaigns to secure more votes than needed even though such scenario is not true and he already has considerable support.
Secondly, a man with morals can easily be taken advantage of by the enemy as they know they won't be involved in anything illicit. One must fight "Evil with Evil". If someone uses a gun to fight even though only knives are allowed you should answer with guns otherwise you'll be played by the enemy, you should always be prepared and not be too naive.
Lastly, for a public official such as a politician mainting high standards throughout the eye of the public is very difficult and one must remember that the final result is of most importance and not the journey in this specific case basically implying that ethics and morals are subjective. For example Hilter was a man of high ethic and morals however he used some stringent technique to get rid of Jews which is not reasonable but looking at his point of view he did not compromise on this ethics and morals and turned out to be one of the most influencial leader of his times though being hated by many.
Finally the above statement is very complex and there are no easy anwers as sometimes it is morality and ethics which wins the heart of the general public rather than trickery and at other times it is how you present yourselves to the public, be it morally or immorally what mainly matters is the support of the poeple.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you'll
...d you should answer with guns otherwise youll be played by the enemy, you should alwa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 489, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... point of view he did not compromise on this ethics and morals and turned out to be ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...is times though being hated by many. Finally the above statement is very complex and...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... and ethics which wins the heart of the general public rather than trickery and at other times...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65306122449 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46845577094 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519274376417 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.311443886 60.3974514979 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.846153846 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.9230769231 23.4991977007 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 5.21951772744 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395485490053 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134311766096 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116674537298 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20007884681 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687074861343 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 14.1392134831 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.