Common moral sense is needed to everyone non-exceptionally since human coexist with diverse people sharing social connections. For this, social orders and moral standards, performing as a tacit promise between people, were established through decades to aim long-lasting society. Leadership is effective to control social members for such aim and this is why finding appropriate candidate is important. Thus, I assert that a public official should maintain the utmost ethical and moral standards.
To begin with, public official, who are one the national administrative crews, have substantial responsibilities to their every single act.. As leader is an exemplary of well standardized social member, leader himself and the adjacent administrative members morality should go over strict qualifications. Also, since their job is to represent social and national needs and discover effective resolvements, they are interpreted as public servant. Since their performance is likely to be based on altruism and patronization, checking their ethics is plausible enough. If some pursue being public official for their fame, potential selfishness or corruption could distract national administration.
As excessive judgement to public officials also retains possibilities of privacy infringement, on the other hand, strict but ascetic level is required. Since public officials are also individuals who have rights to protect their privacies, some judgement of which aim is to only undermine the public officials qualification should be discriminated. For example, Barack Obama’s “birther” controversy by his disparagers, asserting his presumed unsuitable perspective will distract national prosper, was highly condemned. Conversely, such vitiations were more reproached by the public pointing it out as irrelevant and more distracting in solving national urgent issues.
However, as public officials represent our city and nation, their morality must be evaluated strictly. Learned from the past, diplomacy is crucial to deduce successive negotiation between nations. Therefore, public wants adroit and upright ones. Even if one is skilled negotiator but unethical, public will remain unsupportive since people are likely to think he or she is too embarrassing to be the nation’s countenance. For example, the former White House press secretary, Sean Spicer resigned due to his combative language and frequently lambasting the press. Without giving explicit information, only just lambasting the press resurged rage from various media and he was thought to be unqualified and distractive enough to current government.
In sum, I agree that public officials need to be upright steadily since they are the face of our nation and exemplary of our society’s member. Even though, excessive moral judgement could violate their privacy issues, still steady monitoring is required if they are qualified enough to be in that place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...sponsibilities to their every single act.. As leader is an exemplary of well stand...
^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...himself and the adjacent administrative members morality should go over strict qualific...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'officials'' or 'official's'?
Suggestion: officials'; official's
...ich aim is to only undermine the public officials qualification should be discriminated. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2523.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88111888112 5.05705443957 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22885306971 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592074592075 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6611063045 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201226929115 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633338170012 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520673949999 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113973103354 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146178645071 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.1639044944 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.