To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre

Essay topics:

To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to your position.

I mostly disagree with this opinion, as besides the moral standards, there are more crucial factors to weigh the effective of the job to be a public officer.

Admittedly, without the highest ethical and moral standards, scandals would mar the reputation of the leader. Besides these policies, the leader himself is also under spotlight, especially in the modern society, the media could play the most important role of monitor a public official's behaviors. For instance, when the media expose Bill Clinton have illegitimate relationship with his colleague Lewinsky, the trust from the public people decreased immediately, people questioned his characteristic of betray his wife, the opponent would not miss this opportunity to against him and challenge his decision on policies. Because Bill did not follow the highest moral standards, the buttress of his opinion was undermined as well. On the contrary, a leader who has high moral standards would help him avoid those scandals and win more trust from the followers, and also could be a benign model of them.

However, when we evaluate the leadership of a public official, some crucial factors could be, does he made effective policies which better developed the society? does he make prudent and judicious decision when facing to the benefits conflict? Does he become an exemplar for other politicians or his team workers? Does he improved the welfare of the public people? and many other questions related with improve and good influence on the society. Take Hoover and Roosevelt as an example, during 1930, American is facing to the economy recession, President Hoover insisted on Laissez-faire policy and believe in the market would recovery by itself, however, the stock market slumped and rampant business investment declined sharply, myriad of unemployed people are suffering from starvation, at the same time, milk enterprise would rather dump their milk which cannot bring them benefit other than give the milk to poverty people. Against with Hoover's policy, new president Roosevelt published new policy to allow government to interfere of economy. The decisive and judicious policy win award and honor for Roosevelt from the public people. Even though Roosevelt has an affair with another lady beyond of his wife, public people still applause him as a great politician. Accordingly, to be a public official, there are many other indicators to evaluate his work, the mainly one is the society contribution which his work brings.

To conclusion, I would prefer some other factors would be more valuable to weigh a public official's work beyond the highest ethical and moral standards, as the most important work for a public official, is to maintain the sustainable development and enrich people's welfare.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Does
...ies which better developed the society? does he make prudent and judicious decision ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...roved the welfare of the public people? and many other questions related with impro...
^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'official'?
Suggestion: official
...ould be more valuable to weigh a public officials work beyond the highest ethical and mor...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, however, if, so, still, well, for instance, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2335.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30681818182 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69246634148 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 105.446422874 60.3974514979 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.352941176 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8823529412 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20763391937 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722297590621 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583647399485 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154116911623 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331753479917 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.