To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A good leader is the one who takes responsibility for the society. The prompt states that an official who has moral laws and good ethical values will be an effective leader. In my opinion, I completely agree with the statement and argue that to become a good leader, official must stand on his grounds and follow his moral values.
To begin, people vote in a belief that the leader whom they chose will do some good for them. Every person votes for their leader by trusting him or her and it is the elected leader’s responsibility to fulfill the people’s necessities. For instance, if a person is elected but if he or she didn’t do anything for the society then people eventually start losing the trust in the government. No matter what how good the party is, it is the individual leader that creates an impact on the people. The above example states that, a leader must stand on his ground and should take care of the bare necessities.
Further, an effective leader is the one who has good ethics and moral values. Even if there is any chance of chaos or trouble, he or she must not go in an illegal way which will have an impact in the future. For instance, if there is any trouble to a particular area because of floods etc, the chosen leader must be the first one to take an initiative and help the people.
However, there are few cases where an effective leader is thrown back. Because of the corruption, leader who stands by his moral values will be out of the picture. For instance, in India, people will always elect on the basis of the money given to them rather than the quality of the official. In this way, a good leader will not be give money for the votes. But at the end, it is the person who gives bribe will be elected. The above mentioned example states that, how good the leader is, it all depends on the nature of the people.
Thus, in my conclusion, I strongly support the view that to become an effective leader a person must have good moral and ethical values so that people will be happy enough about it and will vote for the same leader if successful in the given tenure.
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station."WWAC must change from its current rock-music format because the number of listeners has been declining, even though the population in our listening area has been growing. 63
- "Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning." 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 46
- "It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people's behavior, but legislation cannot reform human nature. Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts and minds." 50
- In 1992, many farmers in Jalikistan began using a hormone designed to produce larger cows that would produce more milk. Since then, childhood obesity in Jalikistan has grown by 200 percent. The amount of milk and dairy consumed by children in this area ha 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 150, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER
Message: Consider replacing "in an illegal way" with adverb for "illegal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...chaos or trouble, he or she must not go in an illegal way which will have an impact in the future...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, thus, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48843187661 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40431233657 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449871465296 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8474389069 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227133624337 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884519336792 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493131757188 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157327900499 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544183922588 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.