To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
A leader is the epitome of his society, and any foreigner will recognise the people by their leader. Therefore, it is important that the leader is strict on his morals and code of conduct, setting himself as an example before his people. Ancient rulers like Maharana Pratap of India are worshipped till date because of his adamant nature in keeping with his morals. Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela galvanised people to walk with them on the path of non-violence and peace to end the brutal colonial rule. History has also witnessed effective leaders like Adolf Hitler who followed different ethical and moral standards in order to ameliorate the sufferings of their people.
In contrast to the statement, some people argue that leaders must not always follow the set rules and regulations in order to get the right thing, in the interest of state done. For instance, many Indians believe that the government should launch a full fledged war against Pakistan to end the nuisance and harm it has been causing India over the period of time, be it in the form of terror attacks or disparaging remarks on internal issues of India. This may violate the priniciple of no first attack of India, but in the end, elimination of Pakistan will be beneficial to India. However, these people should also consider the damage that will be inflicted to India in international relations. Countries might no longer be able to trust the set policies of India. Even many citizens of India will feel that, if the current leaders does not respect age old policies, then how will they adhere to new policies like reservation that hinder the general public but is of benefit to the minorities. This will give rise to lack of confidence in leader, and will render him weaker.
Another example is of the longest ruling party of India- Indian Nationa Congress (INC). Over the years, it has indulged in so many malpractices like corruption or favouring interests of other countries other their own, that it eventually led to people throwing them off the government in 2014 elections and providing the opposition party- Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP) with an emphatic win. Between 2004 and 2014, the politicians of INC had a myriad number of corruption cases lodged against them. They were indulged in corruption from sports scandals like Commonwealth games scandal to energy scandals like Coalgate scandal. They were also accused with making their relatives like Robert Vadra land available at cheap price. The outrage of people against them for not following the principles, once set by Mahatma Gandhi, led them to get kicked from government leaving them with handful seats few constituencies. This highlights the importance of following moral and ethical standards especially by a leader.
In order to be an effective leader, one must conform to their highest moral and ethical standards and not deter from them inspite of harsh conditions. Not following moral and ethical code will eventually lead to people losing their trust in them like in the previous case of INC.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...harm it has been causing India over the period of time, be it in the form of terror attacks or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 942, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...licies like reservation that hinder the general public but is of benefit to the minorities. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al and ethical code will eventually lead to people losing their trust in them lik...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2545.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00984251969 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57676714207 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533464566929 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2825969729 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.19047619 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1904761905 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137174235851 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488483973188 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524088737116 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102794948972 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501406370088 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.