Being occasionally dishonest is a good way to maintain relationships with friends and loved ones.
"A friendship that last 7 years, will last forever". In any relationship honesty is a crucial factor in maintaing the strength of relationship. The relation can not only be between friends or loved ones but also between employees and boss, director and manager. Without trust, one can simply suspect other person without properly analysing the issue. While some people feel that honesty needs to be ensure in any relationship for long-lasting, most are of the opinion that it takes time to build honesty in relationship. Hence being dishonest occasionally will help to understand the value the other person takes in relationship.
The chief reason for my view is that the honesty and trust are the most important factor in any relationship to grow eventually. Generally in relationship people tends to believe in each other and may face allegation of trust issues. For example, In many coporates, partners sign the documents without actually reading about it because of the trust and honesty in friendship. Finally I belive that being dishonest and untrusty occasionally just to analyse the behaviour / intention of the other person in relationship is necessary.
Secondly I belive that being in relationship with your loved ones, one needs to know every emotion of the other person. One need to understand thier loved one's care, sadness, joyness. However, one must also need to understand the negative potential of a person like rudeness, dishonesty, untrusty factors. Therefore, It's a better option to being dishonest in certain situation but with positive intention.
For all the reason state above, I therefore conclude that first we need to build honesty and trust in relationship by being dishonest occasionally with positive intension.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 532, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... time to build honesty in relationship. Hence being dishonest occasionally will help ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...of the trust and honesty in friendship. Finally I belive that being dishonest and untru...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ishonesty, untrusty factors. Therefore, Its a better option to being dishonest in c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 277.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35740072202 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96126853386 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527075812274 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4954697697 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.9333333333 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281965393661 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099881827638 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846496251534 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182023765101 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342583373221 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.