The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Does best ideas arise from passionate interest in commonplace things? Are there other sources that stimulates brilliant ideas in human? Different things and circumstances incites great thinking in human. Such things include observation of the environment, occurrence of strange events in the presence of a person and intentional determination to create an idea by ruminating or meditating over something. However, in the midst of all these factors, it is true that best ideas come from passionate interest in ordinary things.
Although, some might argue that best ideas emanate from other factors such accidental occurrence. They might argue further by saying some important discoveries of the world are as a result of unexpected occurences. A typical example of this incident is Flemmings accidental discovery of pennicilin. True, while conducting unrelated experiment, Flemmings was able discover pennicilin which has served as a therapeautic agent to different skin irritations for several years. But, on the other hand, this accidental discovery hardly occur. Most brilliant ideas that shook the world have their roots in observation of the environment. For example, different machines and devices used by man today. Machines such as cloth washing machine and dish washer are all as a result of the inventor’s determination that a device should be built to handle human quotidian task.
Apart from this, some might argue that best ideas are as a result of frequent research on a particular subject. For example, Alva Edison’s light bulb was as a result of several researches. This thereby leads to a brilliant discovery of light bulb. This is true to some extent. But let’s consider other inventories such Graham Bell’s telephone invention. Graham’s invention of telephone was as a result of the study of two cans that are joined together by rope. These two cans joined together by rope were used as toy by children whereby a child at one end talked into a can while the other child listen to the outcome on the other end of the can. This innovation led Graham to develop the device known as telephone today.
Additionally, man’s observation of the stars led to the use of stars for navigation. Man also observed the moon and other planetary bodies such sun. Man’s desire to reach other planets grew when it was possible for man to measure the distance from earth to other planets. This innovation has led to man travelling to the moon, Mars and some other planets. These great achievements were as a result of important of develop interest in ordinary things such as the firmaments.
In conclusion, innovative ideas that reshaped the world today came from the observation of commonplace. Example include Graham Bells discovery of telephone, Man’s desire to travel to the moon and other planet, great devices used by man to carry out daily activities such cloth and dish washing machines. Although, some great ideas are as a result research or unexpected circumstances, these ideas are rarely seen or noticed in the society. Therefore, developing interest in ordinary things eventually leads to brilliant idea
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sionate interest in ordinary things. Although, some might argue that best ideas emana...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2638.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23412698413 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85890322753 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46626984127 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.719103376 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9333333333 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123108328707 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412234135207 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058811857095 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824532264686 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518976460537 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.